All white cast?


The trailers and IMDB list shows the main actors are all white.

How is it possible in this day and age? And from Disney? And from Kathleen Kennedy?

reply

they were just tired of losing money..........


but nazis again??

this movie will fail like a fat rocket

reply

What is wrong with Nazi? All the good Indiana movies are fighting Nazi: 1&3. The bad ones are not fighting Nazi: 2&4.

Bring Nazi back in 5 is a good sign this will be a good movie, like Wolfenstein: Indiana must fight Nazi!

reply

Your logic is unimpeachable.

reply

You make an excellent point.

reply

Nazi villains are way down the list of what made I and III the best Indy films. Belloq was the best of the villains and he was just a collaborator. He could just as well have been only what he actually was: a rival archaeologist. The actual Nazis could've been replaced by anyone from anywhere. Nazis are used only because they're a safe, politically uncontroversial option.

reply

Then what make 1 and 3 good?

reply

Action, adventure, great acting, no annoying characters, intriguing mystical treasures, wit...

reply

And Nazi.

reply

For you maybe. Temple of Doom wasn't merely mediocre because of the absence of Nazis, nor did Crystal Skulls suck because of it.

reply

Honestly, I found Marcus a little annoying in Last Crusade, because they turned him into the buffoonish comic relief. He hadn't been that at all in Raiders, he was a completely serious and reliable senior academic colleague, and sincere friend to Indy. All in all, that was a minor annoyance in an otherwise outstanding film, so it doesn't bother me much, but I still didn't like the direction they took with Brody's character in the third movie.

reply

Excellent point. I felt the same way about the buffoonification of Marcus in Last Crusade.

reply

The person you replied to already mentioned Marcus. Maybe you meant Sallah who was similarly buffoonified?

reply

Temple of Doom is NOT a bad movie, you dumb shit.

reply

What's wrong with Nazís?

I think you mean what's wrong with USING them as the enemy in a movie.. I SERIOUSLY hope that's what you mean.

In any case, it's wrong because it's the LAZIEST thing you can do for a villain or enemy in a movie. It's the 'historical bad guy' (after all, the winners write history), Hitler is thought to be the most evil man in all history, the Nazís the most evil group in history (although looking at Mao and Communism.. but we're not allowed to mention that), so it's not exactly CHALLENGING or expression of creative writing to utilize 'those guys' as the villain.

It doesn't require any thought, everyone already hates Nazís, so you don't have to do any character building or worldbuilding, it's all premade. It's like using stock footage or writing only tropes and clichés, or some premade texture pack that everyone uses.

It's not completely wrong, of course, but it's just so incredibly lazy, that unless you use it well or have something new to say, a new angle to the whole thing, or are able to make good comedy out of it, it's just so obviously lazy, it should raise an alarm in anyone wishing to see a good movie with good writing.

reply

Leftists/jews control hollywood and they've been obsessed with nazis for generations. It's their political boogeyman.

reply

exactly....... and if they absolutely HAVE to go back to WW2 all the fucking time, how about focusing a bit on the Japanese during that war........ the things THEY did, make the Germans look like choirboys in comparison.

have you ever had of Unit 731 ?

Holy shit.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731


Guess Hollywood are afraid to step on the toes of the people that make all their electronic equipment !

reply

What do you have against Japanese, are you a racist?

I mean, Japanese still exist, for crying out loud, and they are people just trying to live their lives in a certain country.

Nazís were a POLITICAL GROUP hell-bent on racistic WORLD DOMINATION. Japan only did the atrocities, not because they planned to, but because circumstances drove them towards that direction and they didn't know how to put on breaks at the time.

They are NOT the same people that current Japanese are, so doing this kind of thing would be incredibly insulting and racistic. WHAT country hasn't done atrocities in history? Your kind of thinking is just like always talking about black slavery and blaming current white people for it.

I know many japanese people, and they're great human beings, for crying out loud.

Don't use history as a weapon and an excuse to be a racist, hmmkay?

reply

You sound very stupid...... the Japanese took part in WW2.
They were on the NAZIS side!

They were fighting with them! Makes them even more despicable in fact, because they were following a leader in Hitler, which language they could not even understand.

And the fact is, the Japanese committed far worse war crimes than the Germans towards prisoners of war.

You are probably a Japanese yourself or partly..... no other reason to be upset.
Your past is dirty, dark and shameful

reply

Hi Tom. Don't bring up old sh!t because it like totally hurts the younger generations feelings.

reply

I don't hate German, because they apologize many times, but Japanese never apologize and keep playing victims: "American are bad, they use nuclear bombs on us."

reply

They support the ones in Ukraine though.

reply

the movie takes place in the 30s when blacks were still slaves

reply

Oh God, I hope you're joking!

reply

i meant servants

reply

Oh, I see.

reply

thank you for your service

reply

No problem.

reply

Many of the actors self-identify as non-white - so it's all good.

reply

Maybe there's a few black nazis for the sake of inclusion.

reply

Can we have a lesbian Hitler too?

reply

If this film has an all-white cast it won’t be eligible for any Academy Awards.

reply

There's plenty of skirts behind the scenes so it'll pass the stupid diversity virtue signaling rule. The movie will likely be shit so the only Oscar's it might nominated for is the score with John Williams.

reply

The rule only apply to Best Picture. Let's face it: this movie has zero chance to win it.

reply

What if Indy transitions during the film? Oscar time.

reply

All this diversity and tokenism... I have a couple of things to say.

1) Isn't it the MOST RADICAL, wild idea, to have not only actual white people in a movie, but an all-white cast? (Though I don't like that term, I am too lazy to always explain it properly) I mean, what could be more 'edgy' in the modern times than defying the norms that strongly?

2) It's kind of hard to make Nazís any other race, exactly because of that they were and what ideologies they supported. To talk about 'Aryan race' being superior to other races, it's kinda hard to then suddenly turn 180 degrees and start being very inclusive. Has anyone ever seen a black or asian Nazí in a movie? I mean, it'd not be AS outrageous as a black queen of England in a historical drama or black Cleopatra, but it'd still be hilarious.

I guess the makers of this fantasy movie with time travel wanted to take history seriously or something..

reply

i wish there was a hot chick in the film

reply