MovieChat Forums > Top Gun: Maverick (2022) Discussion > No Cold War level tension + plane design...

No Cold War level tension + plane designs unchanged in 35 years = flop


Title says it all.

reply

Plus funding Scientology and Chinese censorship.

reply

Is it really funding Scientology?

reply

well in theory yeah.
Scientologists donate their worldly goods to the cause
Tom is a scientolgyer
Tom will be getting some seriously phat stax$$$ for this deal.

reply

Well in theory yeah....

LOL.

Hate filled people.

reply

It doesn't matter to me. Since 2016 I haven't paid to watch a movie and never will again. I'm sure the moralists in Hollywood wouldn't want my tainted money.

A VPN and a streaming box allows me to watch what I want without soiling Hollywood's coffers.



reply

Valid points!

But people will see it anyway , for some reason people are chomping at the bit for this , whereas other sequels / remakes they will shun on principle no matter how good it is.

reply

You think? It'll be interesting to see how this pans out. I don't know if this movie will bring in the dough based on nostalgia alone, but I could be wrong.

reply

Nothing appears new in this movie. I doubt if I see it.

reply

Looks like people did bring the dough

reply

I would love a legitimate sequel to Top Gun...patriotic, high testorone, with great characters and story. Would love to see a great story about where our heroes from that movie ended up, but alas, it looks like Hollywood has already wrapped it's lips around CCP dick and we will get nothing of the sort.

reply

also its competing againist Dune and Denis is an actual filmmaker as opposed Joseph Kosinski

reply

Oh come on, he's improved a lot since Tron: Legacy.

reply

Villeneuve is on Par With Nolan Hahaha very funny quit hating on Dune

reply

Where did I hate on Dune in my post?

reply

This is the basic design of almost all modern fighter aircraft. Designed in the late 1960s through the early 1970s. F14 - F18. Example: The F16's first flight was in 1974.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16_Fighting_Falcon

So the design is even older than you thought. BUT there is nothing like a fighter jet on earth. Nothing comes close. Probably never will in anyone's lifetime who will read this in the next 50 years. PS. I know about drones and rockets.

Here's a list of the F planes(fighter) on wikipedia. Fascinating subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aircraft_of_the_United_States#Fighter

reply

I still don't like the original. We bought it just to see if my opinion would change. It didn't.

Not going to see this one.

reply

Pro-Communist China Propaganda after the pandemic = flop. I hope they lose millions on this, and I hope that the livelihoods of everyone involved in this production are destroyed.

reply

Technology has improved and changed greatly. The F-18 outperforms the F-14 in every way except for top speed, and the F-35C has a huge advantage with it's stealth. Autonomous drones are another leap forward from the 1980's.

reply

There's something missing from your equation. The calculation result is incorrect.

reply