MovieChat Forums > Better Call Saul (2015) Discussion > Do you believe in "good guys" and "bad g...

Do you believe in "good guys" and "bad guys?"


Isn't one of the points of this show, and BB too, that few, or none, are 100% good? If that's true, when do they become "bad guys?"



I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

Yes, of course. And as the show makes clear, Jimmy was never a "good guy".

reply

And who was?


I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

Hm. If so, they're going to fail. How does a show about a guy like Jimmy make some larger point about whether there are few to no actual good guys out there in the whole world of seven billion people?

Nah. The first point here is that these characters are capable of both good and bad thinking and actions. The second point is, maybe, that a lot of other people are like this. That's acceptable on its face. Whether it means there are zero to nearly zero "good guys" and "bad guys" out there is a question beyond the scope of a show like this, IMHO.

reply

I think the basic takeaway is that nobody's perfect.

-------------------------------------
"You just stroke it all day. You're a hero!"

reply

People are just people. There is good and bad in everyone. Life is not black and white.

reply

I don't believe in good or evil people. People do whatever incentivizes their life. The concept of morals only came about due to civilization. The natural state of man is just to survive and reproduce. We're just modified apes with the ability to lie and more complex emotions than our primate cousins.

Good will towards strangers is just as unnatural as sadism. Neither of these traits are beneficial to long term survival in prehistoric conditions.

So it depends one one's definition of 'good' and 'bad'.

reply

The concept of morals only came about due to civilization. The natural state of man is just to survive and reproduce.


So are human concepts like "informed consent" to be labelled as "unnatural"? Human morals might be a component of our evolution, so as to provide social stability over a longer time period. After all, we humans not only survive and reproduce, the rearing of our young requires of us a much bigger investment in terms of time and resources - perhaps particularly so when compared to most if not all other species. Thoughts?

We're just modified apes with the ability to lie and more complex emotions than our primate cousins.


Many, many other species have the potential capability of deception as part of the spectrum of their social/survival/reproductive strategies.

Eusociality can also be observed even in insects.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Good will towards strangers is just as unnatural as sadism. Neither of these traits are beneficial to long term survival in prehistoric conditions.


How do we know for sure what was and was not beneficial to long-term survival in prehistoric conditions, if both the conditions and the strategies with which we met those conditions, are undocumented (i.e. "prehistoric")?

It would seem that some reasonable co-operation (as opposed to these extremes of what you call "goodwill" v "sadism"?) with strangers might very well be beneficial if it opened up opportunities of trade. Hasn't there been evidence uncovered which indicates that skills and tools were shared amongst "strangers"; brought over long distances to strange lands?

It just seems like a kind of confirmation bias to jump to these kinds of theories that "man is a savage, so let's all relax and go with that" (not that that is what I'm saying you are doing - but some do actually take it that far); but our cerebral cortex is what blesses us with the curse of getting to wrassle with our own minds.

Re:
Modified apes


It's so disappointing to have to compare ourselves with apes all the time.
Have you ever looked a little closer at birds? Some species' courtship rituals are a delightful allegory of human behavior(s). Or so I like to fancy. Give it a go if you like; no harm done. ;)

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Saul is a bad good guy.... or was it a good bad guy? 

reply

The "is he a good guy or "is he a bad guy" discussion gets so worn out.

Give me an anti-hero who does some noble things with a side of doing some horrible dirty *beep*

reply

Re: The latter half of the OP's question:

If that's true, when do they become "bad guys?


When they put on the black hat.

This is one of the things I find worthy of discussion: the way by which "good" and "evil" are color-coded as "white" and "black", respectively, in our entertainment culture.

Our recognition and interpretation of this color-coded dichotomy is reflexive and instantaneous to the point we may give it no thought at all.

Should we consider this acceptable?

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Can you elaborate on why you question its acceptability?

.....
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

Can you elaborate on why you question its acceptability?


Yes.

I question its acceptability because the assigning of white and black to mark "good" and "evil", respectively, acts to culturally embed racist concepts.

Things like racism do not exist in a vacuum; they become normalized and reinforced through our everyday culture, language, and symbols.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I agree with your second point about normalizing racism by the numbing effect of everyday customs and language.

I'm curious as to where you saw this happen in BCS (or BB, as your sig suggests you're very interested in that series, as well.)

In BB, WW literally donned a black hat as he "turned", and at various times when his alter ego went into action.

Is that what you mean? If so, where's the equivalent in BCS?

.....
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

In BB, WW literally donned a black hat as he "turned", and at various times when his alter ego went into action.


Absolutely. WW's donning of the black hat was one of the exact images that played through my mind which exemplified this. Yes. This is what I meant.

And, if you've watched "Westworld", there was actually a scene in which a character was literally presented with two separate walls; one with rows of white hats; one with rows of black hats. Standing there...deciding.

And you know, I've been thinking back to BCS for an equivalent (even before you asked) - and only just now I think I've hit upon it.

When Saul put on (or at least finally embraced) the pinky ring. Thoughts?

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I think the use of the black hat to proclaim the birth of Heisenberg was intentional on Gilligan's part, as were some other color cues he discussed (on DVD commentary) using to denote the emotional tone of the characters. It was a little too on-the-nose for my liking, but there was a lot of that in BB.

I haven't watched Westworld, or only one or two eps, I should say. What I saw struck me as juvenile, so I dropped HBO, thinking I might go back and binge-watch the series if I was stuck for something interesting. The hat choice scene you describe is the kind of thing that pushes me away, too obvious. That said, there are only a couple of series which haven't done that kind of thing, and sometimes you have to overlook the gaffes if you're going to have anything to watch.

I don't recall the pinkie ring scene in BCS. Would you happen to remember the name of the ep? (I haven't rewatched much of BCS since the season ended. I was surprised to come to this board and find my thread still alive.)

.....
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

Re:

Too obvious:


Right?! I decided to pursue it, however.

Pinkie ring


Let me try n' dig up the ep.#

**Have an A1 day**

reply

End of Season 1 finale:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RipXtO0W7mU 1 min. 38 seconds

I thought that the cinematography gave the ring some prominence, and the way his pinky ring-garbed hand was tapping that wheel, helped visually communicate his turning point to me.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I always enjoy it when folks who are more observant than I point out things like that. Thanks for the link!


.....
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

OT:

When the Spanish Catherine of Aragon died in 1536, both her widower, King Henry VIII, and his fiance', Anne Boleyn, reportedly appeared in public wearing yellow.

To this day, the debate rages on regarding whether this was a disrespectfully festive action on their part, or whether the couple had done so because yellow was a Spanish mourning color.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

All of this, of course, is not so much a condemnation as it is an objective inquiry into cultural symbolism. And I believe that, while "good" and "bad" might be useful as shorthand terms for marketers and entertainment producers, they tend to be counter-productive when it comes to self-reflection in human beings. Particularly, perhaps, when everyone seems to be in such a rush to label themselves as "good".

**Have an A1 day**

reply

give it no thought at all.

Should we consider this acceptable?


I gave it no thought at all with Heisenberg's hat other than it looked good. I also gave it no thought at all in WW other than it looked good. I happen to be a hat collector, so all I think when I see a white or black hat (or any other colour hat) is if I would buy one.

reply

I gave it no thought at all with Heisenberg's hat other than it looked good. I also gave it no thought at all in WW other than it looked good. I happen to be a hat collector, so all I think when I see a white or black hat (or any other colour hat) is if I would buy one.


Cool. I used to wear a very distinctive red hat. Hats are awesome.

What I'm talking about is how "good" and "bad" are non-verbally represented through color coding in popular culture.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I just don't see it in black and white. The only non verbal representation I saw through colour was the different colour palettes in shows like BB and Hannibal, or the abuse of orange and teal in tv shows to make them look cinematic, or prime colours used by people like Michael Bay or those overblown crime shows. My only reaction to William in WW choosing a white hat was that it would get dirty pretty fast. I didn't automatically think white= good and black = bad. I don't do it with cats, dogs or horses either.

reply

I didn't automatically think white= good and black = bad.


But a lot of other people do - and so that is why this black/white color coding is used so often (and so effectively) in entertainment culture.

It is also why, unfortunately, so many black dogs and cats in shelters are less appealing to potential adopters.

*owner of a black dog, here - and a former owner of 2 black cats*

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Oh I'm sure they do. It's just never occurred to me to think that way.

Woody Harrelson in The Duel. Cool hat. It's white. And he's a bad mofo

http://www.thereelword.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/the-duel-woody-harrelson.png

reply

Yes, Harrelson is one unique cat. He does things his way.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

My only reaction to William in WW choosing a white hat was that it would get dirty pretty fast.


In case it wasn't clear, William chose the white hat because he thought of himself as "good"...but...

...in the end, we discover that William had eventually abandoned all of his "goodness" - and his transformation was also very much visually represented for WW's audience by his all-black clothing - including his hat.

Edit: I'm curious about why you don't recognize this common black/white color coding. Do you recognize other forms of color coding - for instance, the common assignment of blue to boy babies, and pink to girls? Of course, this is not a universal custom - but it is particular to western society.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I just don't think in terms of black being bad and white being good. Even when I was little I didn't think of kids at school having black hair or dark eyes as bad, or blondes being good. And the blue and pink thing I just find annoying. I've never liked pink and prefer blue.

reply

I just don't think in terms of black being bad and white being good.


Ok.

What I'm trying to find out is whether or not you recognize what this color coding in popular culture tends to successfully communicate to its audience. Even if it doesn't happen to communicate its intended message to you personally.

Even when I was little I didn't think of kids at school having black hair or dark eyes as bad, or blondes being good. And the blue and pink thing I just find annoying. I've never liked pink and prefer blue.


Again, this is not about personal preference. I'm asking you if you understand how a society attaches meaning/significance to particular colors.


**Have an A1 day**

reply

I'm not sure what you're not understanding. I don't think in terms of black and white. I simply haven't been programmed that way. And getting back to BCS - where is the black hat/white hat scene? I think you're seeing something that isn't there. The brothers represent human frailty, not black is bad and white is good.

reply

I simply haven't been programmed that way.


Then you should be in an even better position to understand the program.

where is the black hat/white hat scene?


There is none. I used the question as a segue to introduce another concept.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Danloki, we meet again! I hope all is well with you.

I think Gilligan/WW's choice of the hat was very intentional, and a tad heavy-handed. It looked silly on him, I thought, but eventually became iconic because of the Legend of Heisenberg. Sometimes the man makes the clothes, not the other way round. WW's choice of the hat, shades, jacket combo looked like what a straight science teacher might think would seem tough and dangerous to a real hard-ass like Tuco. So, maybe Gilligan meant it tongue-in-cheek. Regardless, it eventually became shorthand for "criminal mastermind", in the show, and in Pop culture.

Getting back to the original question about the racial implications of black and white. I think that most ethnic groups, regardless of skin color, might characterize light as good and dark as bad, simply because of humankind's instinctual fear of what could be hidden in darkness. What we see in the light can scare us, but what might lurk in the darkness can inspire terror limited only by our imaginations. I'd guess that in racially-charged cultures the meaning might be a blend of the primal and cultural.


.....
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend

reply

What we see in the light can scare us, but what might lurk in the darkness can inspire terror limited only by our imaginations.


And yet.

When I look at the darkness, what I see is the richness of the black earth which sustains life.

Or the majesty of the comforting night sky.

We may ourselves find protection in the dark, and a beauty that is limited only by our imaginations.

Food for thought.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Happy New Year, Marlon Gearing up for the new season?

I thought the hat was intentional as in the style, not in the colour as such. It's a cool hat and would have looked just as bad ass in green or blue. Now if he had worn a Montechristi that would have looked out of place.

Total hat nerd here.💃

reply

It's a cool hat and would have looked just as bad ass in green or blue.


Breaking Bad's use of color has been openly and often discussed by the show's creators. For example:

"And the blue that Walt wears in Season 3 in my mind is a subtle indication of Walt moving towards Skyler." - Vince Gilligan

As has been pointed out by Marlon, "WW's choice of the hat, shades, jacket combo looked like what a straight science teacher might think would seem tough and dangerous to a real hard-ass like Tuco.""

And it worked; not only as an impression upon the fictional Tuco, but also as a powerful visual representation to the audience regarding the character's inner transformation. To some, this might seem overly-obvious and jejune - but, considering the show's painstaking use of color to augment the show's expression - what do you suppose they would have had to be communicating by making Heisenberg's hat blue, instead?

If you are not "programmed to think in such a way" about color, then why the alternate "green or blue" in particular? Why couldn't neon pink be used just as effectively to convey Heisenberg's badassery?

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I quite clearly stated I was interested in the colour symbology in BB. Did you miss that? I'm simply not an SJW that sees black = bad and white = good.

Now tell me all about the colour of Jimmy's suits in your mind and how that's racist.

Jesus christ.

reply

danloki.

Why are you getting defensive about this?

**Have an A1 day**

reply

Now tell me all about the colour of Jimmy's suits in your mind and how that's racist.


Well there was a certain white suit he'd had made for himself to communicate his aw-shucks folksy goodness to his prospective elderly clientele...

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I'm simply not an SJW that sees black = bad and white = good.


No. You're simply someone who acts increasingly threatened when it's pointed out that other people do. If the shoe don't fit, then don't wear it.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

I missed the memo where I was supposedly threatened by some hipster SJW third wave feminist.

reply

I missed the memo where I was supposedly threatened by some hipster SJW third wave feminist.


Oh I would hardly describe myself as "hip".

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

danloki.

Listen.

Your use of pejorative stereotypes does not lend strength to your arguments as to your fairness and non-bigoted worldview. I'd hoped to be proven wrong. You've disappointed me.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

your arguments as to your fairness and non-bigoted worldview


What arguments about my fairness and worldview? I simply said that unlike you I don't see black as bad and white as good.

You've disappointed me.


You amused me.

reply

What arguments about my fairness and worldview? I simply said that unlike you I don't see black as bad and white as good.


No. You said, "Unlike an 'SJW'", which you've now confirmed was intended to refer to me; using an acronym that has also been designed to convey negative connotations.

I indicated an appreciation for your interest in hats. And you denigrated my interest in cultural semiotics.

You amused me.


I'm glad. I aim to entertain as well as to enlighten.

**Have an A1 day**

reply

As I grow older, I've come to learn that there is no good or bad, exclusively. Both can be found in everyone. However, I think there comes a point, where we choose to be mostly one or the other.

reply