For "gender role reversal" to be a thing, and a problematic thing no less, first you have to believe that traditional gender roles make sense, and that they are universally applicable, or should be. If you do, you're gonna have to explain that position to me, because what I see are an ex marine acting like an ex marine would, and an academic acting like an academic would. I don't see how gender trumps everything else that goes into making a person who they are. You HAVE noticed that people are different, right? Some are introverted, some highly social, some are thoughtful and withdrawn, others bold and quick and loud, some are pacifist, others are aggressive, etc. etc. Lots of personality traits exist and converge in different people in any number of complex configurations. Some traits are statistically more likely to coincide with others, and with this or that gender, but you can't apply statistical probability to individuals. Statistical probabilities aren't rules.
Or... "Girls are docile, boys are macho, pink and blue, end of story, I have spoken, grr."
I can understand how a simplified world view can be restful to the mind...
reply
share