My Interpretation


Just watched this, and see a lot of reviewers who are baffled by it. But by the end, it became quite clear to me what the intent was with this film, and I endorse the wisdom it attempted to convey, because it lies at the heart of everything else in human reality. It's actually quite simple in concept, but complex in practice and comprehension due to all the noise that plagues our existence. At its core, "Flashback" represents our power to choose, and the trappings that spawn from those choices, as well as the choices of others. But it suggests, rightly so, that we aren't as bound by the limitations we perceive are imposed by those choices as we tend to think.

In fact, we can choose to reprogram ourselves any way we want at any time we want, and choose a different mindset. We are not a product of our past, nor of the conditioning of our upbringing, or of the dreams and wishes of our parents, the rules of society, etc. We, and we alone as individuals, have the power to choose how we think and feel and act. Circumstances and other people can’t choose for us unless we let them, but choosing to let some of them do so is also a valid choice, as long as it's a conscious choice.

And yet the vast majority of the population live their entire lives ping-ponging around off all of those barriers, those walls, letting everything else shape who they are, how they think, how they feel, and therefore how they act, without realizing, or perhaps only catching glimpses, that they're the product of those mechanisms. Which in turn extends those conditions and limitations onto others.

The movie conveys this several ways, one of which toward the end is by associating images of the "big bang" (the birth of the universe) with Fred's mother (the "lifeform", as the message across spacetime tells him, that's imposing its will onto him), with his personal "big bang" (Fred's individual birth), and up to that point throughout the story by disassociating time and parallel timelines into an infinite "now", which represents our power of choice that we only think we're engaging in, but that most of the time isn't really our choice at all.

It's about waking up to the fact that nothing else has power over us unless we let it. We’re in charge of our own programming. Concepts such as "groupthink", "confirmation bias", "ideology”, "religion", “tribalism”, "belief", etc. all stem from this core conceit.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

So many people don't see it like that, they would rather blame everything external than admit they have internal problems they should work on.

reply

Very true. Regardless of what anyone thinks of the film, I think it's message rings true. Interestingly, it's a blend of conservative and liberal ideas, ideologically speaking, since a byproduct is the notion of personal responsibility in lieu of blaming others for letting oneself allow others to influence how one thinks, feels and acts, while simultaneously embodying the more progressive idea of avoiding entrapment of the past and rules, to not cling to tradition as a comfort, but to instead "explore" with an open mind, as the character of Cindy expresses in the movie. Which is why "picking a side" at all is so detrimental to personal growth and enlightenment.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

I agree with you. The education in this film is really realistic and I love it. Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. I understand how important education is for us. Together with the company https://edubirdie.com/personal-statement-writing-service I am writing a personal statement to get my dream job. And my education plays a huge role in this.

reply

I loved this movie. Would be ten outta ten, if it managed to make sense at the end. It did not. My rating then became a seven.

reply

Yeah it was definitely very obscure at the tail end. Instead of wrapping up the story that came before like The Butterfly Effect (which for some reason I associate this to), it turned into more of a metaphor than anything existing within the reality of the movie, forcing the viewer to interpret all the imagery and tie it into the theme it presented, with barely a hint of explanation. I think it does make sense in that respect, and in that way is internally consistent, but it loses any groundedness whatsoever. I think a 7 is quite fair.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

I also got butterfly effect vibes. The movie was definitely consistent. But I knew from the start pretty much it wasn't going to get wrapped up in a nice little bow. Can't say I wasn't entertained, glad I don't have epilepsy though. I wish there more flicks like this.

reply

LOL. "Epilepsy" made me laugh, but it's actually a good point. The strobing was excessive.

Hey, if you liked this you might like the 2009 film "Triangle" by Christopher Smith, if you haven't seen it. It spawned massive amounts of discussion back in late 2009 that last years, and I ended up writing a massive treatise on it if you're bored enough to waste some time. But I quite like this film (along with most time loop movies like Primer, Predestination, Time Lapse, etc.)

https://moviechat.org/tt1187064/Triangle/5abec15cebcc1a0014426ff7/Triangle-Mythology-and-Science-Spoilers
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

I liked triangle, only seen it once though. Didn't really like primer, but I watched when I was like 14. I might like it now. I have been meaning to watch predestination one of these days.

reply

Yeah Primer is very low budget, and isn't the best acted. As a movie it's almost hard to sit through, honestly (at least more than once, although I made myself do it to discuss the time travel aspects of it). But as an example of very well-done time travel plotting, it's about as pristine as it gets. It's very tightly scripted in that regard.

Predestination is based on the Heinlein novel "All You Zombies", is a superbly correct example of a bootstrap paradox, and it's also very tightly plotted and more interesting than Primer. It does go to some very dark and weird places, but I won't spoil anything here except for what's behind the following line that you can choose to look at or not: Ethan Hawke's character is his own father, mother, and grandfather, which is about as perverse as incest could possibly be.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

Yeah I remember primer being very well thought out. But it was to clinical. Sacrifices great mechanics for good storytelling. They could have done both. But yeah no spoilers for me, I like to go in fresh. I went in fresh for this Dylan O'Brien movie and was glad I did. Even reading the synopsis can ruin a story these days.

reply

That's the perfect way to describe Primer.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply

[deleted]

Thank you for this interesting post. I havent seen the movie but this is good. I might need to at some point.

reply

Absolutely! And thank you for the feedback.
_________________________________________
Never believe or disbelieve. Always question. Rebuke bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

reply