MovieChat Forums > user111
avatar

user111 (358)


Posts




Replies


It's true, a president who proactively attempts a coup d'etat because he doesn't like the fact that he lost a free and fair election is a fascist. If you think otherwise then it implies you don't know the meaning of the word. You're saying that like your opinion matters. Not at all, if you were paying attention you'd know trump supporters testifying have fully admitted they were duped even though some stills support him. It would help if you paid attention. Is that the best you can do Burk? It's true, a president who proactively attempts a coup d'etat because he doesn't like the fact that he lost a free and fair election is a fascist. I actually have more respect for you than your typical trumper so I know that this logic makes sense to you. I know you're capable of considering the flip side circumstance. If a dem president had attempted the same thing you would most certainly recognize him as a fascist. I suppose that's why you responded with ad hom, it's your way of capitulating because can't make an argument to defend trump based on the merits. lol. Clearly the Schneier article I cited is above your pay grade for you to think it's just an "automated patch server" that fixes it. rofl. You would have learned otherwise if you had the capacity to even read the article. You keep embarrassing yourself brux by trying to speak my language when it's so obvious you have no idea what you're even talking about. The totality of the damage assessment from the SolarWinds compromise is not even yet known and mitigating potential compromises involves far more than just patching Orion software. I'm not going to waste my time ELI5-ing to you again since you've proven to be utterly incapable of understanding the topic. But if you're truly interested you should read Schneier. He is the most respected independent security researcher in the field and he tries to break it down for laymen like yourself. That's why I cited him for you instead of a highly technical piece that would be beyond your capacity to understand. But Jesus brux, the fact that you would embarrass yourself by citing such a well known Bush era propaganda mouthpiece for Iraqi WMD as Lawrence Wilkerson demonstrates how you really have no shame. You talk the talk like you understand there should be healthy skepticism of anything coming from the establishment. Yet instead of seeking truth from the forensic scientists whose job it is to determine these things you go citing an infamous right wing hack because you can't stand the thought of being wrong. I thought you had more integrity than that, but like I said I grossly overestimated you. Your laughably ignorant opinion on this topic is simply irrelevant. My mistake was taking you seriously. It's past midnight now, time to put the little ones to bed. Happy New Years brux and have a nice life. Unlike you I have real work to do and a family to feed so you'll have to excuse me on passing on reading your predictably bitter reply. 😉 lol. I'd love to entertain your conspiracy theories Brux, I just don't have the time. You see while you cite a GOP lackey like Lawrence Wilkerson who doesn't even present any evidence to support his claims, I've been working with clients all week to patch the SolarWinds hacks. I read the security bulletins and I'm familiar with the technical details. I follow what the real security experts in the field like Bruce Schneier have to stay on the subject, not mouthpieces of the establishment that you've been duped into believing like Wilkerson. looolz. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2020/12/russias-solarwinds-attack.html ROFL. You are such a fraud brux. I work here in silicon valley and if you had any technical knowledge at all you'd be able to speak my language. You'd know why the attack signature has Russian fingerprints all over it. You don't, that's why you've reduced yourself to repeating Wilkerson's disinfo and thinking Malcom Nance supports your conspiracy theories. FYI: He doesn't. No evidence my ass. If you only had any idea just how ignorant you sound to anyone with any real knowledge of this hack like me. Not dupes like Wilkerson. looool. I'm done reading your tantrums. You are deranged Joe Willi. Trump did win in 2016 despite legitimate claims of fraud by scientists and Hillary conceded anyway. https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/index.html Trump meanwhile has NO LEGITIMATE CLAIMS OF FRAUD. NONE, NADA, ZILCH! Every Single Lawsuit thrown out of court on LACK OF EVIDENCE. So yes Trump is the Ultimate Sore Loser and so are you for believing him. For the sane, yes. But we also support euthanasia for the terminally ill who are losing their mind. (you) "Trump has a habit of backing down from the Commies." Sounds like you backed a coward. He doesn't have the stuff to be prez. It's good that he lost. I'd still love to see him try. He'd get crushed like a bug and there'd be no better way to discredit his movement. Apparently Guiliani of all people talked him out of it. View all replies >