MovieChat Forums > Politics > NY vs. Trump: Bragg's own witness, Hope ...

NY vs. Trump: Bragg's own witness, Hope Hicks, implodes case against Trump

posted 15 days ago by BKB (6480)
14 replies | jump to latest

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-braggs-witness-hope-hicks-implodes-case-against-trump

"Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg should turn himself in to authorities for impersonating an honest lawyer"

In an epic miscalculation that backfired spectacularly, prosecutors in the Manhattan hush money trial of Donald Trump called Hope Hicks to the witness stand. The moment cross-examination began, their misbegotten case against the former president began to collapse.

Hicks, who served as press secretary during the 2016 presidential campaign, explained that Trump’s motive for suppressing salacious stories was to protect his wife, Melania. "Absolutely…I don’t think he wanted anyone in his family to be hurt or embarrassed about anything on the campaign. He wanted them to be proud of him."

"The account by Hicks demolishes District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s primary claim against Trump that he paid porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence with the intent to benefit his campaign and, thereby, influence the election by "unlawful means." To the contrary, it nicely corroborates the findings of a federal investigation that no crimes were committed, or campaign finance laws broken because there was another purpose for the non-disclosure agreement that Daniels signed."

"Like the prosecution witnesses before her, Hicks disparaged Bragg’s planned star witness, Michael Cohen, Trump’s one-time personal lawyer. "He used to like to call himself Mr. Fix-It, but it was only because he first broke it." Ouch! But that denigrating remark is tame compared to the other derisive comments that have been leveled thus far at the insufferable Cohen, who is a convicted liar who went to prison."

🤣🤣

TRUMP 2024

[–] robocat893 (13790) 15 days ago

Brought to you by the Fox News Entertainment channel who were fined close to a billion dollars for lying to their viewers. Of course you're so stupid you believe anything Fox tells you. Also, this is an opinion piece you dumbshit. It's not news. Trump is fucked and so are you. 🤣

[–] CraigC (7001) 15 days ago

What about CNN's case brought by Nick Sandmann? You shitheads always leave that one out.

[–] tvfan (8793) 14 days ago

His only deflection is regurgitating the same nonsense about an internal payoff. Because the book of yahoo told him.

[–] tvfan (8793) 15 days ago

Stormy’s lawyer Keith Davidson was arrested trying to extort Terry Gene Bollea over a sex tape.

Keith made a deal to avoid prosecution by providing the FBI with Cohen's emails and agreeing to testify 'falsely' against Trump in the Bragg Prosecution.

They are all cutting deals to falsely testify against Trump.

Jack’s ‘records case’ has also imploded due to the recent unredacted files.

[–] robocat893 (13790) 15 days ago

Without conspiracy theories you have nothing you complete idiot. I'm still waiting for your evidence that you claim to have that the 2020 election was rigged. With your orange master sitting in court you should release your proof of a rigged election now so Trump can be reinstated as president and all of the 88 felony charges against him will be dropped. Why do you refuse to help Trump?

[–] Gd5150 (11136) 15 days ago

So another victimless “crime” with zero evidence.

Courtesy The Democrat rectum.

[–] robocat893 (13790) 15 days ago

There is audio, video and photo evidence of Trump breaking the law. Is all this evidence fake somehow? Are all of the 88 felony charges mostly for being a traitor that Trump is facing just a huge Democrat hoax to make Trump look bad? You are so stupid it hurts me.

[–] tvfan (8793) 15 days ago

Yeap, another one. And they can always fabricate the evidence.

[–] robocat893 (13790) 15 days ago

There is audio, video and photo evidence of Trump breaking the law. Is all this evidence fake somehow?

[–] BKB (6480) 15 days ago

How come we never hear from the liberals at this site when it comes to stuff like this?? It's like they've clammed up and have 0 to defend on this?? Oh, that's right, I have 11 of them on Ignore and it's wonderful.. 🙄

[–] Skavau (9898) 15 days ago

Haven't you blocked most of the people you call liberals on here?

[–] B1cKsurN (15064) 15 days ago

You're aware that the ignore feature removes potentially tons of replies to ignored users that you never see, correct?

[–] BKB (6480) 15 days ago

Oh, I know.. I don't care because they're on ignore for a reason with 0 to offer other than the usual back & forth trolling over one man in Donald Trump and I'm sorry, but I just can't wrap my head around why and it's because of this, that I simply choose to shut people out that are like this and it's been a pleasure truth be told.. 😎

[–] Information-Police (4184) 15 days ago

"Hicks also said that Trump told her it it was better for the [Stormy Daniels] story to come out at that point, in 2018, rather than before the 2020 election. “It was Mr. Trump’s opinion that it was better to be dealing with it now and that it would have been bad to have that story come out before the election,” she said."

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/03/politics/donald-trump-trial-takeaways-hope-hicks-day-11/index.html