bought the AR15 in order to massacre his classmates whom he called "libtards", but instead the Kenosha protests occured so he decided to massacre protestors instead. I think it's a viable theory:
Is that seriously M Moore's theory? or Adumz interpretation of it ?
Has anyone actually listened to the podcast linked in the OP ?
reply
share
acidraindrop (3055)
2 years ago
I have a theory, you know. He couldn’t buy the gun because he was 17, so he got somebody to buy the gun for him. And I mean, right away, because we made “Bowling for Columbine” and we’ve studied this issue quite a bit. When a teenager can’t get a gun and they get a slightly older person to get them the gun, we know what’s coming next, don’t we? I mean that gun is going to be used in high school. And especially if it’s an assault weapon like that, they’re not going deer hunting. And so I have this theory, frankly, that the gun was bought for those purposes. So all of a sudden, a riot is happening in Kenosha. He sees this (and this is just a theory now). But if he was planning to do a school shooting, this kept him from doing it. He said, No, no, no, I’m going to take this gun and go to Kenosha. I’ll take care of business there. And sadly, two people died. But man, what if the Kenosha riot prevented Kyle Rittenhouse from going and shooting up his school, which could have been the original plan? Why was he in need of an assault weapon when there was no rioting going on in Kenosha?
reply
share