MovieChat Forums > Rear Window (1954) Discussion > Perfect example of why not to remake eve...

Perfect example of why not to remake every bloody movie


This is on right now.

Such a classic.

Always makes me think why would they re-make a movie like this.

reply

Hollywood tends not to have new ideas, and producers hate spending and losing money. Good ideas and good screenwriters are expensive. The Pyscho remake starring Vince Vaughn included the original Psycho screenplay, virtually word for word. Same with original soundtracks. Filmmakers started not to use composers decades ago choosing to pay copyrights for popular songs instead. Many filmmakers are still artists, but the money comes from the producers, usually. Hollywood filmmaking is a balancing act struggle.

reply

On re-using screenplays...

It's always been fascinating to me that in Theatre, plays are written to be performed over and over by different theatrical groups, amateur and professional. Playwrights make money that way. People still go to see them, to see how the new staging or cast interprets the scripts. But that was never the case, apparently, with screenplays. When a move is re-made, it is generally with a new, and sometimes completely different, script. While I completely enjoy dozens and dozens of classic films, I've long wondered how they would be if produced with new casts and direction, using the original script, much like a stageplay. I'm sure the results would often be less than stellar, but nonetheless interesting in the right hands.

reply

Disturbia is a Remake with teens

reply

this actually has a remake, from 1998, i think i once saw it but can't remember what i thought of it, i thought the remake of "psycho" from the same year was grotesque, pointless and awful. a lot of black and white movies from around this time but the ones that are in colour are really in colour, and this has some really groovy colours, today's movies are often filmed in that dark blue damp way, how about the early shot of the half naked 👙 blonde in the window, the slow motion during the kiss looked weird, this movie actually doesn't need a leading lady, mostly her only part is arguing with stewart, the story revolves around stewart and the neighbour raymond burr, the fate of the dog 🐶 makes me like this movie less. pretty remarkable when you think about it, but the leading man james stewart sits in about the same spot throughout the entire movie, that makes the ending the more intense, another remarkable thing is i don't think you hear, spoiler, the villain's voice until one and a half hour into the movie. close to the end it looks even earlier like he's about to get thrown out the window when he lands on the bed. i often miss hitchcock's cameos, i've never spotted him in this despite seeing the movie several times, often i think his movies end too abrupt but this had a nice satisfying ending.



🦽 🔭 🌇 🌆 🏙 🌃 🌡




launch to space,
since you started come by most every day,
are you an alien for real or what,
like an exquisite painting with lightnin eye,
and talkin me straight before saying goodnight,
as to earth i land back down.

reply

Remakes can lead to marvellous things, though. Alistair Sim stars in a near-perfect A Christmas Carol, but I still loved the Muppets' version. The Maltese Falcon is a remake. Red Harvest has reappeared about seventy times as films like Yojimbo and A Fist Full of Dollars. Heck, this movie is based on a story. Now, okay, that's an adaptation, but you see my point?

I think the key is to remake stories with a new take, angle, or flare. To explore them from a different sensibility.

I do agree that any remake of Rear Window would have its work cut out for it, but there are surely great ways to tell this story that wouldn't be bad.

reply

The 1998 remake of Rear Window is ironically at its best when not focusing on the suspense plot. Christopher Reeve's paralysis led to a rewrite of the script and much of the first hour involves his character getting into an accident and having to adjust to his new life. These scenes were honestly touching. Unfortunately, it takes forever for the murder plot to start up and even then, they make it clear the Thorwald character is guilty, with no ambiguity at all. It's sadly lacking compared to Hitchcock, even though it took a very different angle, which I have to respect in principle at least.

reply

I haven't seen the remake, but it sounds like it probably destroyed what made the original Hitchcock a great film.

reply

It pretty much did, yeah.

reply