"I disagree on the looks. Tina Louise was a perfect 10."
Wow, people really haven't been to Asia much or seen Korean or J-Pop idols or or or..?
This 'numbering' thing is tricky, because people don't understand how it's supposed to work. Just because YOU like someone's look and think they are the perfect ones, doesn't mean she is a ten in any kind of more absolute meaning of the rank.
I have known faces I have absolutely loved, and would not want to have changed them in any way, but I have always recognized that they are not 'tens', whereas the rest of the world is concerned.
This woman is DEFINITELY not even close to being ten, and I didn't know you have to add adjectives and qualifiers to these ranks.
It's as if you sub-consciously KNOW she's not a ten, so you have to add the word 'perfect' in there.. just to convince yourself.
Look, I will give her a 'six' on a good day, but without any make-up, she's probably closer to a 'five'. Fair enough?
These number rankings never work, because people misinterpret what it's supposed to mean.
A ten does not mean 'perfect', and you don't add qualifiers to the number, unless it's something like 'solid' or 'and a half'.
The numbers have to do with this planet's gene pool (usually - if you happen to encounter a beautiful visitor from another planet, you probably should use a different scale altogether).
This means, it's not some kind of 'opinion', it's not some kind of 'confidence thing' as women seem to think (everyone is a 'ten' according to women, so there's no point in EVER asking women about this stuff, or they rate themselves 'ten', thinking anything less would be disparating themselves or not confident enough, and 'confidence' is something they project as being important in mate selection, because to women, it is).
I SIMPLY means someone's rank within that gene pool.
So a ten does not mean anything 'perfect', it does not mean 'can't look better', etc.
reply
share
avortac4 (3668)
a month ago
Ten would simply mean, she is ON PAR with the BEST-LOOKING women on the planet. That's it.
The comparison is to 'what this planet has to offer'. If this planet ONLY had bug-ugly women, then the rank would not even mean much, but a 'ten' would not necessarily even be good-looking, let alone beautiful. If a six from the current Earth then happened to move to the bug-ugly planet, then she would instantly become ten, and the previous 'tens' would be lowered to maybe three max. Then she would be the measuring stick.
So the way it is SUPPOSED to work is:
- You take the BEST-looking women on the planet, the best gene pools, the best DNA, the best faces and bodies, the people that look 'maximally good' COMPARED TO OTHERS, so they are the cream of the crop, the best this planet has to offer. Those are tens.
- You take the SECOND-best-looking women on the planet, then compare them to the best-looking ones to rank them 'nines', then compare them to anything worse-looking to solidify that rank. Those are nines.
And so on.. the 'ten' does not mean some 'etheric opinion thing', it means a very solid, hardwired fact based on the best-looking people on the planet. This woman might be charming to you, but that does not mean she ACTUALLY belongs to the small group of the best-looking women on the planet. Those women are SO good-looking, there are no better-looking ones (only equals and lower ones).
Women don't understand this concept, so they always rank themselves 'ten' or choose some arbitrary lower number if they want to appear 'humble' or something.
Men don't understand this concept, so they always rank 'whatever their boner happens to schwing to' as ten and then even add silly qualifiers to boot.
If we lived in a rational world, we would all understand the ranking system and use it appropriately.
You are not making any sense using it wrong - you belong to the women who just arbitrarily rank themselves or other women 'ten' regardless of facts.
reply
share
avortac4 (3668)
a month ago
Now, you can hate, dislike or not appreciate some 'tens'' looks, but that does not mean they are not tens. I have seen women, whose face I absolutely hate and think they are not charming or good-looking to my eye - but I have also recognized their 'general beauty' and can tell their number pretty accurately, because I realize other men would probably see them as good-looking, gorgeous or beautiful.
So the 'consensus of what most men would think' of someone has a lot of bearing on the rank, but even without any men's viewpoints, these ranks would still be pretty much the same, because beauty is so universal that even an A.I. could probably rank women correctly most of the time.
Beauty is beauty, even if there's no one to see or rank it - you can have different opinions about which kind of beauty you like or love, or like better than some other versions, and you can even think something 'factually beautiful' is rather ugly, but you should keep your opinion separated from the more factual ranking.
Beauty is actually surprisingly predictable. If there's a 'classically beautiful skull and face shape' with genetically 'good looks', most people will instantly react to it as 'beauty'.
In any case, your ranking system makes no sense, because you obviously base it in subjective emotions/experiences/boner rather than objective evaluation, assessment or facts.
reply
share