Tough viewing nowadays due to the lack of diversity

No, sounds like he's genuinely trolling to me.

Is it ? Which people? I don't know what you are talking about.

Unless you cared about the Untouchables TV show, which was entertainment and not historically accurate either, you'd have no idea if the cast of the movie version has been diversified.

Just like with the TV show The Untouchables, making something entertainment instead of document means you automatically fewer restrictions and can make choices you believe will result in a better, more entertaining show or movie. It's not a prerequisite of entertainment based on historic events to diversify the casting of characters. That's just a thing that chickenshit people, and trolling cunts, say in order to make some perverse bullshit point about movies that haven't done specifically that.

As per the OP the issue is with the lack of actors of color in this production.

No it isnt .
Absolutley no one is upset about that including , crucially , YOU

I think it is worthwhile.

Can you cite one example where the casting of white actors to play white characters has been labelled racist?

I think it’s more enjoyable without being polluted with unnecessarily cast minority actors. It has enough diversity.

Where's the evidence of segregation? (i.e. Where does the [u]movie[/u] dictate that whites are only permitted in certain places and non-whites in other places?)

If the demographics are irrelevant then why are you only focusing on skin color?

Are you really going to argue that people of color are more important than those who are handicapped? What about little people, the mentally challenged, people without limbs, Albinos, and people in comas? Why aren’t you fighting for these people to be seen?

The film wasn't made in the 1930s you are very correct , it was made in 1988 and it represents life in the 1930s very accurately , not sure what the issue is here.

Take boyz in the hood for instance, if you were to replace the cast with mostly white men , so Tre Styles white, do you think that film would have the same impact? no it wouldn't.

I like my films that are based on historical events to be as accurate as possible, otherwise it just doesn't appear authentic, imagine a film about Mohamed Ali played by Chris Hemsworth , meh , aint going to work is it, or Hitler played by Michael B Jordan , not for me im afraid.

What happens in a hundred years time say, when a "white" population largely doesn't exist anymore

Where's the diversity?