MovieChat Forums > The Sixth Sense (1999) Discussion > How did The doctor not realize?

How did The doctor not realize?


*****SPOILER ALERT*** please do not read if you haven't watched the movie.


Ok according to this, because the doctor was dead, no one except the boy (because he could speak to dead people) could communicate with him right?

Does that mean that the doctor didn't communicate even one single word to anyone else all those months? I mean even if his marriage deteriorate, there would be times where it would be unavoidable to talk for some stuff when you're living under the same roof. People don't go MONTHS without speaking even some mundane thing. And what about the other people? Like maybe if he went to buy something from a shop? Didn't he realise that the shopkeeper neither saw nor heard him?Or let's say he tried to take a cab? I mean, people HAVE to do day-today stuff like that all the time. For all those months when he seemed completely invisible to every single person, wouldn't he have started wondering what was up?

reply

Does that mean that the doctor didn't communicate even one single word to anyone else all those months?



For starters, we're not given any insight as to what actually transpired between the time when Dr Crowe died up to the event when he is about to meet Cole in the Fall season.

It is left for interpretation such as, perhaps, the soul doesn't always reach the afterlife right away. Instead, like Dr Crowe, the soul/ghost returns near the time of its death, perhaps days or months later in a process, searching for a way to resolve any important issues that may require closure in order for the soul to pass on. This is just one interpretation. If you want to consider the notion that Dr Crowe became a ghost the moment he died, he still may have lingered for months in some sort of limbo, to account for the time that he would have believed that he was shot, injured, and recuperating in a hospital. This would reinforce the premise that, "ghosts only see what they want to see." This concept of ghosts only seeing what they want to see is how Dr Crowe could go on and on, endlessly rationalizing the many odd things that you have previously mentioned; the things that are essential in our lives but maybe not essential to a ghost. One example mentioned in the FAQ section of this webpage makes a point about Dr Crowe being unable to open the door to his study, which you should read.

I guess you would also have to be open to the idea that two married people could live in the same house but not really speak to one another and sleep together in the same room for a few months at a time. You know, I remember friends of mine who have told me stories like that about their moms and dads.

Most importantly, the concept of moving the next scene (after we see Dr Crowe injured) into "the fall season" was absolutely essential to the plot's development and misdirection. Yes, the audience had to believe that Dr Crowe had recuperated after months of rest and now is back on the job months later.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


"well WIFE knew he was dead so it's not a matter of them "living together" at all. "

True, the wife obviously knew that he was dead, but Dr. Crowe (and the viewing audience) didn't know that he was dead. In fact, the director creates a kind of "troubling distance" between Dr. Crowe and his wife which is purposely not explained to us. By creating an unexplained spat or disagreement between Dr. Crowe and his wife (this much we do know as Dr. Crowe tries to explain this to the viewing audience), the audience can easily dismiss the fact that we never see his wife actually carry on a conversation with him - for example.


Eram quod es, eris quod sum

reply

It's a gaping flaw and one which makes the twist fairly cheap.

reply

Not a flaw and it's been discussed in countless of topics around here. Like is said in the movie "ghosts only see what they want to see". They don't want to see they're dead, so they pretend there's a different reason people won't talk to them or, like the lady in Cole's kitchen, pretend that someone they CAN communicate with (like Cole) is a person they knew from their own lives. How else would you explain people from centuries ago not noticing they're walking around in a different era? Time evidently doesn't pass the same way as it does for the living. Being dead is like having a dream, where things make sense even though they don't.

reply

Agreed, it's not a flaw. Keep in mind that, since the Dr. is a ghost, he doesn't have to eat or buy groceries or actually interact with people at all. He may have only been "jumping" around to different points in time and places with no awareness of the times in between. Like a dream. When you dream, usually you just appear somewhere with no explanation of how you got there, but you accept it. Usually you're not aware you're in a dream even though there's a huge logical flaw. You just accept it as reality without question.

reply

@Stratego How else would you explain people from centuries ago not noticing they're walking around in a different era?
There were people from centuries ago walking around? I don't remember that in the movie.

reply

"Hanging" around, then.

reply

scottishnpaddy wrote: It's a gaping flaw and one which makes the twist fairly cheap.

The only thing cheap here is your lame opinion. Evidently you just didn't listen. "They only see what they want to see." means that the dead DO NOT see reality the way the rest of us do. This was revealed at the very end and when finally see that the reason Dr. Crowe cannot get into the basement is that a table had been placed in front of it. At least 2 to 3 times previously he had attempted and there was no table there, or at least not one that he saw.

Not a gaping flaw; not a cheap twist. And let's remember something else - it's JUST A MOVIE, not a dissertation on how the dead would move about among us.

reply

I agree with you that this was no flaw. However, the apology "it's only a movie" is also lame. It is entirely fair to ask a movie to adhere to its own internal logic (as this one does). Let's not let all the lazy filmmakers off the hook with "it's only a movie." Movie making is an art form and more is demanded of it than that.

reply

Agreed, he saw what he wanted to see. They explained it in the film.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit me!"- Hudson in Aliens.

reply

Agreed, he saw what he wanted to see. They explained it in the film.

---

yes, that was the framework for the analogy used in the movie [ghost = drug hallucinations], but in the case of the shrink he never REDEEMS himself and in the end wants to INCREASE the Zoloft for Cole even more than that prescribed by "another doctor like me" [but of course as a ghost he can't].

he [mis]treated Cole exactly as he did to Victor [or was it Vincent] and all the other kids involved in his Award.

So Night did his normal "Kill the Bad guy as a moral" [but "twice" in this case].

that was 1999 and [prescribed] drug abuse is worse than ever.

the contradiction is the movie made a fortune but not for the REAL message but the "bums on seats message" re ghosts

or to put it another way J Doe only sees what he wants to see, and Night was to be proved right 2 years later with the 9/11 "Happening"

http://www.kindleflippages.com/ablog/

reply

It makes the twist obvious. I knew right from the start he was in spirit. See Point Blank (67).

reply


"It's a gaping flaw and one which makes the twist fairly cheap."

Definitely.

Take the scene near the 20-25 minute mark, where the boy comes home to his mom waiting with Bruce's character sitting right next/opposite to her on a chair. It's as if they have been having a chat, and are both just waiting for the boy to arrive.

So Willis just sits with the boy's mom, on the opposite chair, without saying a word to her, and with her completely ignoring him, without it raising any reaction in him. And for how long? Minutes? Half an hour? More?

How did he get in the house, did he ring the doorbell, and have a chat with the mom, who then let him in?

Or did he just walk through the walls (and not notice anything peculiar about that new ability of his), or just SNEAK inside, when the door just happened to be open, (which wouldn't be very 'professional', and how would he proceed from being an uninvited intruder and possible threat to just calmly sitting together with the mom - I mean, if he was on the physical side. I mean, from his psychology, how would he explain such an intrusion?)..

..and then just sat on the chair without exchanging even A WORD with the boy's mom?

Come on. That scene alone -screams- "IMPLAUSIBILITY", louder than pretty much anything in any even relatively good movie I have ever seen.

With the explanations we are given, the cheap and thoughtless twist really brings way too many plot holes and renders most of this movie completely useless anyway. I mean, what's the point of almost any of what happens, because the plot is not really about what happens anyway?

Fight Club delivered a similar twist much better. Not only is it plausible, believable and doesn't require that much suspension of disbelief (just some acceptance of artistic liberty), but it also doesn't make the rest of the movie meaningless, but on the contary; a lot more meaningful and interesting.

This movie is just boring droning on that the cheap twist just can't save. Why would anyone care about a plot like this; twist or no twist?

This is one of those movies that seem to have been made for the benefit of the twist, rather than the other way around. The twist should serve the plot, not the plot serve the twist.

If you take away the twist from this movie, what is left? Nothing much.

Take away the twist in "Fight Club", and you still get a good message about corporations and individuality (which the message itself obliterates, though, by lying about people not being unique), an exciting flick with entertaining events and some interesting perspectives, points and narration. And although I don't care for him all that much usually, Pitt does deliver a charismatic presence and a heckuva great acting performance in that movie. It's also relatively unique and does provoke the viewer to think.

This movie is just boring, insignificant and lazy - without the twist, there would be just dull emptiness. With the twist, there's a couple of almost-interesting revelations and lots of boredom. A mediocre experience at best.

Besides, how could ANYONE not realize they are dead - if they retain full consciousness after the transformation? (Some people deny 'life after death' so much during the physical phase that they actually sink into a sort of coma, only to be awakened by the next incarnation - but they will wake up some day)

I mean, DEATH. It's not just a "oh, something probably happened. Let's just continue life as usual" event, and even when it is a bit, it's so completely different AND it would not happen on the physical level, AND you couldn't use your astral eyes to see into the physical side that easily, without training, AND .. well, we will all see how it works, when it happens to us.

But the point is, astral world and the physical world are as different as the world we exist in when we are sleeping and dreaming, and the world we exist in when we are in the usual state of consciousness. Sure, there are 'lucid dreams', and dreams, that you think are real (I think a couple of nights ago, I actually laughed at the preposterous presentation, when some people tried to convince me something ludicrous was actually happening - I just denied it, because it was just so silly), but there's no way you would not even suspect that something is amiss if the dream was prolonged for extended periods of time.

So many things are (and work) so differently - the body no longer has this heavy weight that the physical body has, and you have to use thought power to move it around, instead of physical muscles, and you can pretty much "fly", the body actually creates illumination (the Yoda of the old movies was right) around it, and you experience everything more vividly - even simple bushes are so alive to you, that you just can't be indifferent to any of them.

It's preposterous that even the thickest ghetto-thug's retarded, inbred brat daughter wouldn't realize the huge, enormous and multi-level difference between "the physical plane" and "the astral plane" existence, life and moving about.

In this movie, he's moving and acting like he doesn't even see any kind of difference having happened. This is just not possible. A lot of things would make you immediately very suspicious about things, even if you didn't at first realize WHAT had happened to you. You would still know that -something- is completely different, you couldn't just continue your old life.

So what does he eat and drink? How can he use physical objects, like pens and things, without anyone noticing? Or did the pens and notepads die too? When he is learning the lating and writing words on paper, does he use the actual physical objects that are there, or some kind of astral-versions of them? And in that case, who provides the astral pens, and why?

This movie is so full of implausibilities and plot holes that it's not even funny. And I haven't even reached the 26 minute mark yet!

Bottom line; THERE IS _NO_WAY_ THAT SOMEONE WOULD REMAIN COMPLETELY IGNORANT OF THEIR BODY HAVING DIED AND NO LONGER INHABITING IT. I mean, if he can see to the physical level without problems, why didn't he see his own body? Why doesn't he levitate? Why didn't he see the paramedics or whatnot? Why didn't he see the revival attempts, or his body's funeral (surely he was drawn to his body's funeral)? How come he remained completely clueless? What was he doing for all those months, where was he, what was he looking at, who was he interacting with, and why wouldn't any helping spirits actually communicate with him DURING ALL THAT TIME?

It's just not plausible, no matter how you look at it.

I don't mind Time-Traveling DeLoreans or odd time-twists that create two alternate timelines, one of which is so horrible that we only follow the happier one (the article in some magazine was pretty good, in how they explained about the other Marty and his awful destiny), I don't mind Cybernetic Organisms coming from the future to terminate someone's mother, if everything is well enough explained, and if the atmosphere, musics, action and the vision of the movie are all good and in place.

But I do mind twists that obliterate the plausibility - just for the sake of the twist.

I dare claim that it's more impossible for a child psychologist to plausibly enter that house, and silently wait for the boy, without exchanging a word with the mom, and not think there's something weird going on (or trying to say things to the mom, and her not even seeming to see him and realize he's there - just watch the scene in Fawlty Towers, where Basil Fawlty very quickly deduced that he's invisible, because no one was responding to him, and decided to go hit some guests - surely a trained psychologist would have made such a deduction much quicker!).

When someone ignores me, I do realize there's 'something going on', you know. But a child shrink doesn't think there's anything suspicious about EVERY SINGLE INDIVIDUAL he comes to contact with, ignoring him for months in a row, without fail.

I know shrinks are a thick bunch, but this is ridiculous.


reply

You've made several brilliant, logical points. It's made me re-think the quality & plausibility of the story itself. I'm not sure I like it as much now.

reply

Finally an answer to Obi Wan's famous question. The fool who follows the fool is definitely more foolish.

reply

@avortac .. How could you possibly know what death is like and what the astral plane is or even like or if it even exists. Stop trying to make logical sense out of something that no one knows anything about with any certainty, this movie is just one interpretation of what it might be like.

As for just the Doctor sitting in Cole's house etc. I believe that the movie interpretation of the ghost's consciousness is more of a broken line than a continuous one. The Doctor would have had no actual experiences apart from the ones we see and appears to be oblivious to anything we would consider routine. He cannot open the door to the basement but then he is in the basement working, it looks like he unlocked the door because he searched for a key but is never shown to actually unlock and open the door, he just is in the basement in the next shot.

reply

I know it's been years since you posted, but I must say you are an impressive blowhard. You made me laugh with this:

"THERE IS _NO_WAY_ THAT SOMEONE WOULD REMAIN COMPLETELY IGNORANT OF THEIR BODY HAVING DIED AND NO LONGER INHABITING IT."

And you know this how?

reply

He only sees what he wants to see.

I interpreted it that these ghosts walk with earth with no real concept of time or reality.
Their reality becomes essential subjective and selfish. Focused on getting help for closure.


http://www.imdb.com/list/rJuB9UoASlQ/

reply

Like mentioned above ghosts only see what they want to, as for the large amount of time being unaccounted for, I'm pretty sure that Bruce Willis's character mentioned something about not being able to keep up with the time to his wife again highlighting this idea.

reply

Ok, the most common explanation given by many is that "ghosts see only what they want to see" and that "ghosts also don't have a grasp on time" as they are in a dream-like state. Fine that would explain how Dr. Malcolm didn't realise he was a ghost until the end.

However, what about the scene when Dr. Malcolm and Cole go to the sick girl's funeral? They ride a bus to get there. Who bought the tickets? Who paid for them? Wouldn't it be the responsibility of the adult (in this case the doctor) to buy the tickets? Just curious.

"I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!"

reply

If he's living in a dream-like state and has no sense of time, maybe he didn't show up until Cole was already on the bus and he imagined he had bought a ticket. Or maybe Malcolm imagined giving money to the bus driver and getting a ticket? He imagines a lot of things. He also didn't see the desk in front of the door to the basement. But Cole knew Malcolm was dead and didn't want to upset him, so maybe he told him that he would pay for the tickets or maybe he asked for money so he could buy tickets for them both. Or perhaps Malcolm had a commuter pass.

reply

If I remember right...Cole seemed startled about Malcolm being there as if he just popped up on the bus...maybe I'm wrong..

reply

Cole was pretty independent though, so he probably just bought the tickets himself. It's not unusual for a boy of his age to travel on the bus.

And it's heavily implied that Cole knew Malcolm was dead all along, so he probably bought both bus tickets, and since Malcolm only sees what he wants to see, Malcolm didn't find anything strange about this.

reply

i feel like this would be a lot smaller of an issue if it simply cut to him sitting on the bench outside cole's house, instead of the 'months later' popping up

love&be comfy

reply

Since Crow was an invisible ghost, Cole probably only copped for one ticket - don't you think? Ghosts, like senior citizens, ride for free. I'm sure that's in the Transit Authority's rules someplace...

reply

I like to think that in the film, ghosts have unfinished business, cliche I know. I also think that because Of this some ghosts are aware their dead, while some aren't. Maybe during the space between Dr Crow dying and him meeting Cole he wasn't anything, maybe he was suspended animation or something.

I think that maybe some sort of higher spirit gave Dr Crow the information about Cole, knowing that Dr Crow needed to help one more child and that Dr Crow would be able to help Cole

reply

It seemed to me that the doctor was only "in this world" sometimes. There was no other times. We assume continuity because of the way we live day to day.

*beep* happens and you deal with it
You make choices and live with them
Everything else is whining

reply

The boy explicitly said that the ghosts see what they want to see. There's no logic involved because the ghosts are now spirits with presumably a warped sense of time, space and reality.

reply