MovieChat Forums > Chicago (2003) Discussion > worst film to ever win best picture

worst film to ever win best picture


it won best picture over FOUR far superior films (Gangs of NY, the hours, the pianist, LOTR)

proves the academy is a joke


K Dizzle Dubs

reply

I watched CHICAGO again recently after a long time, and was still jazzed by it. It's simultaneously jazzy and fun, while being dark and cynical and satirical. Maintaining that tone for a whole film was pretty significant.

I loved CHICAGO and I remember when it came out there were a number of accusations of it "ripping off" MOULIN ROUGE (as if; those two movies are like matter and antimatter), and I think there were some others who were turned off by how sleazy and manipulative the "heroes" are (that's the point, it's satire). Whatever, I still love this movie.

And Cecil B. DeMille's THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH is also ranked by many as THE worst film to ever win an Oscar; it really was more of a body-of-work award to DeMille rather than on that film's merits alone. (Actually, I checked; it's now largely seen as winning because the REAL best film of the year was HIGH NOON but because of its anti-McCarthy allegory nobody wanted to vote for it, so DeMille's tripe won out in the end. Jeez, who says Oscar voting isn't political?)


Facts need to come before certainty.

reply

Quite obviously the people who LOVE Chicago had never seen SWEET CHARITY and CABARET. Bob Fosse was the innovator of stage musical transported onto the big screen. Chicago is flat and boring in my book. It looked like it was made for TV.

Luhrmann's Moulin Rouge is in a completely different class from this mediocre effort.

I agree. At least The Hours was much better.

I can't see how people could imagine Chiacgo is up there with the greatest musicals such as The Sound of Music.

reply

I concur, bad! There is nothing new about this movie. This is a remake of "Roxie Hart" 1942, and not even as good as that!!

reply

To whoever said that Oliver! is undeserving of Best Picture,please see the movie before judging from the poster or other people's ridiculous opinions.The film is a masterpiece,though 2001:A Space Odyssey was the better film.
The Academy should have 2 BP categories, Drama and Musical/Comedy like the Globes.
That way films like Shawshank Redemption would have won along with Forrest Gump,or Pulp Fiction.

reply

This is a remake of "Roxie Hart" 1942

Well, that's pushing the definition of "remake" a bit.

They're two different stories inspired by the same older source material, but taking it in different directions (sorta like Chisum and Young Guns). There are some pretty fundamental differences between the stories of the two movies. Let's start with the fact that Roxie actually did NOT shoot the guy in Roxie Hart (and wasn't having an affair with him, either). Then there' the fact that Velma Kelly is virtually (if not quite entirely) removed from the story in Roxie Hart.

reply

I find for the most part that people who like musicals love this movie and people who don't care for musicals can take it or leave it or simply hate it.
And 'best' is subjective. Some people (and the Academy, for sure) think Best Picture has to be important, serious. It is good every now & then to see something fun get rewarded. The Hours is a very good movie....fun, it ain't.

reply

I don't think that Chicago is even close to be the worst film ever to win. I think the only thing that generates all the hate is that it won to such great films as the other nominees (I still can't believe Gangs didn't win anything).

P.S.: The worst is obviously Crash.

reply

I still can't believe this piece of garbage won over "The Pianist".

reply

Crash and Shakespeare in Love. Rented Shakespeare In Love at the library and was so happy I didn't pay for it. Sat there waiting for it to start for over two hours. When I watch Saving Private Ryan to this day I can't wrap my head around how SIL won over SPR. And Crash? Wasn't even released in theaters and wins Best Picture? Please!

reply

And Crash? Wasn't even released in theaters and wins Best Picture?

Yes, it was. It might not have gotten the blockbuster, 3000-screens sort of release, but it most definitely was released in theaters. I even saw it in one.

Movies that don't get theatrical releases, or are shown on TV before their theatrical release, aren't eligible for Oscars at all. Was it Red Rock West that was ruled ineligible for the Oscars because it had gotten a preview airing on one the premium cable networks (Showtime?) before its theatrical release?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Disagree. It was the superior film of the five.

And about bad Oscar winners... IMO "Argo" is worse, "Shakespeare in Love" is worse, "The King's Speech" is worse, "The Hurt Locker" is worse, "Slumdog Millionaire" is worse, "A Beautiful Mind" is worse... and a lot more.

reply