MovieChat Forums > Burlesque (2010) Discussion > Christina is NOT attractive enough to le...

Christina is NOT attractive enough to lead this movie

posted 13 years ago by GrammarMatters
38 replies | jump to latest

Sorry. I find NOTHING attractive about her. Not her face. Not her body. And certainly not the way she moves or the way she dances.

She is just one of the LAST women I would ever be attracted to (although she looks great compared to Madonna or Sarah Jessica Parker.)

That being said, I think she looked better in this movie than I've ever seen her look before - but still nowhere near good enough for me to be "mesmerized" into caring about watching her on the screen.

Kristin Bell, on the other had, is GORGEOUS ! She looked perfect. Stunning face, beautiful shapely hips. Sexy body - and she (or her body double for the dancing) was great.

Christina just does NOT have a body I want to look at. Not at all.

And then I started to notice other things - like her lipsyching was off - and that was really annoying.

It's just hard to care about a character when you don't look forward to the next time you will see them on the screen.

But at least she is more attractive than Lady Gaga.

[–] Nina (539) 4 years ago

excuse me? When you think of the Aguilera from the 90 and her dirrty times, she was really hot looking.
Later she started wearing strange things and did Looks which didn*t fit her.
But in burlesque they used light make up for her which I loved.
I also think the more natural blond shade looked great on her.
She looked ten years younger in this movie.
She was really pretty in that movie.
But unfortunately one or two years after this movie she started using lip fillers and ruined everything.

[–] Nina (539) 4 years ago

Whether you were into xtina as a singer or not, you can't deny she was styled very natural for this movie.
And she looked absolutely stunning!
With less makeup she looks so young!

I think in this movie she looked hot and cute the same time.