MovieChat Forums > West Side Story (2021) Discussion > Spielberg's annoying use of lens/light f...

Spielberg's annoying use of lens/light flares almost ruins the movie


Lens/light flares have sort of become Spielberg's trademark, as most of his later films have them, and the directors who claim Spielberg as their inspiration also include them quite a bit (witness JJ Abrams SUPER 8 as an example). But in the past, light flares have been used by Spielberg sparingly; they were used to emphasize a shot or to give an otherworldly sensation (as in the spaceship shots in E.T.). But in WEST SIDE STORY he really goes overboard!! They start when Tony and Maria meet behind the bleachers and are almost non-stop after that. I found them annoying as hell. I have two major problems with them:

1. They do not appear in nature but are the result of light interacting with the camera lens, thus they announce the existence of a camera alongside the actors, which I would think you'd want to avoid.
2. They are completely avoidable which means they are there because the director wants them to be there, so they are essentially the director shouting out his/her presence to the audience.
Every time I saw them in WSS they took me right out of the film.

reply

Spielberg should have stuck to making kids movies, that's what he knows how to do.

reply

No, he should stick to adult movies like Munich and Bridge of Spies. His kiddie times are past.

reply

And also Schindler's List.

reply

West Side Story is also a move for all ages, but it would've been better if he hadn't bothered to remake it. The fact that spielberg busted his hump for 15 years to get the rights to the film West Side Story does not mean that reboot/remaking the film version of West Side Story was a wise decision on his part.

reply

I came here to make exactly the same point. Way too much, what's the point? Spielberg has been doing this overlit, bleached out thing for a long time now, as if it's dawn in every single scene with multiple suns. The other thing that bothered me was the constant mottled blue palette which became tiresome like everything's been put through the same iPhone filter. The lighting in the 'America' sequence really worked though.

reply

The overall lighting, color, and the backdrop scene settings in the old, original 1961 film version of West Side Story are among the reasons that I, as a devout fan of the 1961 film version of West Side Story, preferred the original film version of West Side Story.

Regardless of what anybody else says or thinks, the old, original 1961 film version of West Side Story cannot be beat!

reply

Completely agree. Strange choice on Spielberg's part to remake such a classic isn't it?

reply

It’s all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

reply

Janusz Kaminski does the lighting and his style has bothered me for years.

I haven't seen WSS yet, but I thought Bridge of Spies was almost ruined by the the heavy overhead lighting. It was too much.

reply

I'll also add that Spielberg's film version of West Side Story is fraught with CGI's, which is not good for people with neurological conditions, either.

reply

There may be some CGI in Speilberg's West Side Story, but there was plenty of filming done on location. This is a great article about the different locations that were used.........

https://www.timeout.com/newyork/news/nine-real-life-nyc-filming-locations-from-the-new-west-side-story-121321

reply

Just because filming is done on location doesn't mean that it can't have CGI's in it.

reply

I do get that. I did say "There may be some CGI" but I don't think the film was "fraught with CGI".

reply

That's not something I'm willing to expose myself to.

reply

CGI? What?

Why would you need CGI in a film like West Side Story?

reply

Today's cinema uses much different technology than in the past, particularly during the 1950's and the 1960's. and I've heard that many, if not most of the new movies coming out nowadays, including the new film version of West Side Story, do have CGI's in them. Also, the lighting in the 2021 West Side Story film version is way, way different than the old, original 1961 film version of WSS.

reply

I can’t see how it would fit in a movie like West Side Story though. Is it for the dancing? Because that would be in the same ballpark as voice dubbing, only it would be more of a visual problem and it would be incredibly distracting, and people would really have a reason to complain. I’ve heard complaints about CGI for years now, not that Hollywood listens.

reply

Whatever it is, I also found Spielberg's film version of West Side Story visually disturbing, as well, which is part of the reason that I could not and would not sit through the entire film.

I have to admit that the dubbing in the old, original 1961 film version of West Side Story didn't bother me, but the 2021 film version of West Side Story was too hyped up for my liking, in any event.

reply

Using CGI for the dancing would definitely be cheating and this movie even more a piece of filth.

reply

Many, if not most of the new films these days, do use CGI's however. I have a hunch that Spielberg's film version of West Side Story is no exception, no matter what he or any of the others who worked with him on his film version of West Side Story think or say.

reply

Doesn’t justify the use of it if there are still people out there who can actually dance. Which I know there are.

reply

The dancing in Spielberg's reboot/remake of the film version of West Side Story is far too hyped up, as far as i'm concerned.

Moreover, Spielberg's film version of West Side Story makes both the Jets and Sharks, as well as their girls, look like they came from wealth, rather than from abject poverty that helps pit groups of people against each other.

reply

I thought the same thing! It was *a little* cool the first time (behind the bleachers) but then just became a tired, overused gimmick.

reply