The first "space" in the title is unneccesary.
It's already been established it's in space.
shareTHAT ENTIRE "MOVIE" LOOKS TO BE UNNECCESARY.🫤
share[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > Space Boobs in Space (2017) Discussion > The first "space" in the title is unnecc...
I was gonna say the title is redundant. Before you even watch the movie there's just very bad scriptwriting on display in the title. Pretty lazy.
shareIt's intentional, not a mistake. It's meant to be funny.
shareIt's a great title. Says just what it means to and needs to about the movie.
shareIt's about vaginas.
shareIt it actually has no boobs, then I'd have to amend my opinion. It SOUNDS like a great title, but I don't like false advertising. To quote the movie Clerks, "I don't appreciate the ruse".
Appears to feature some zaftig women, which is cool with me. But I'd be annoyed with a title like that if they don't show any more than you see here.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7456544/mediaviewer/rm939371521/
It’s a joke. Obviously.
shareI don't know. It could have been about alien space boobs on Earth.
But the title establishes that is actually featuring space boobs in the space environment. So maybe it's fair...
Oh, so the space boobs were an origin story before they actually entered space?
shareI was more thinking that the space boobs were actually from space in the first place and hadn't reached Earth yet.
It's maybe like Battlestar Galactica was a forerunner of Galactica 1980. Originally the space boobs would be in space but maybe at some point they would discover Earth.
So Space Boobs In Space would help us differentiate the film from its sequel, Space Boobs On Earth...
Mathematically, both Spaces should cancel each other out, or perhaps double. I'm sure I have a point, but I can't grasp it.
shareIts possible the space boobs may have not been in space . They may have landed on a planet. The title is clarifying that this is not the case