MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Why do people whine about electric vehic...

Why do people whine about electric vehicles? hear me out...


Why do people whine about electric vehicles? hear me out...

People are eating the narrative: ELECTRIC CAR BAAAAD!!!
As repeated into reality by fox news and quite OBVIOUSLY, big oil propaganda....
...when... now, think about this a moment...

Electric cars are not for them. Why even care?

Here's the hear me out part. And I'm not trying to convince anyone elec cars are good. No no no.

Here's the story:
- electric cars charging uses normal burning which is BAD.
- making batteries from those minerals is BAD.
- too over priced, too short lived, too small a range.... etc etc etc

Are people blind?

Yes, that is all true, BUT...... are you familiar with how all other automobiles are made???? AT ALL???? All the parts, the chemicals, the plastics, metals, rubber things that wear out and need replaced.... ALL CARS ARE BAD. Duh. NOT just electric cars that mega trillionaire oil companies want you to believe.
ALL CARS. Period.

Part two: Ferrari

Do all of you own one? No. You don't. Those cars are build for, and bought by specific peoples.
- They use normal burning which is BAD. and to an extensive amount: 11 to 22 mpg BAD
- they're made of special and expensive parts like special metals, wood and leather, which is BAD.
- too over priced, don't last as long as normal cars, break down and cost a ton more.
in short, they are not for everyone.

Why aren't people whining about Ferraris? Oh. They burn OIL creating $$$, I forgot.

See my point?
Ferraris are not for everyone.
Electric cars are also not for everyone. Who cares? Drive a jeep or a truck if you want to. Or an electric car. Or a Ferrari.

Stop the whining about electric cars already.

reply

Many here are saying the same old things:

Not good in heat
Not good in cold
No distance

Well duh, it's a new technology.
Like any thing, needs time to improve

I know people that drive them in heat and cold and distance.

reply

"Well duh, it's a new technology."

No, it isn't, not even close. It's a very old technology. I already told you that electric vehicles already had their moment in the sun over 100 years ago. Studebaker made their first mass-produced EVs in 1902, two years before they made their first ICE vehicles. There were even public charging stations for EVs in some places back then.

By 1900, electric cars were so popular that New York City had a fleet of electric taxis, and electric cars accounted for a third of all vehicles on the road.

https://archive.curbed.com/2017/9/22/16346892/electric-car-history-fritchle

Battery technology is what needs to be drastically improved, and batteries have been around since 1800, meaning they are almost as old as the United States is. The rest of the technology is fine, i.e., electric motors are very simple and the technology behind them is very mature with little room or need for improvement, and the rest of the car is no different than an ordinary ICE-powered car, so that technology is fine too.

EV batteries that can be fully charged in a minute or two (i.e., the time it takes to fill an empty tank of gas at a typical gas station) aren't going to exist any time soon, because that would require a fundamentally different, and unknown, battery technology. A half hour or more is ridiculous. Who wants to wait that long to "refuel" their car? And what if there are a couple/few people in line ahead of you?

Also, batteries will never be repairable by a mechanic, and since they are ridiculously expensive, once they die it will cost more than the vehicle is worth to replace them, making EVs effectively disposable (despite not having a disposable price). As an example:
For the Tesla Model 3, the replacement cost around $15,799.27, with the battery alone costing over $13,500 and labor costing $2,299.27

https://www.cbtnews.com/replacing-a-tesla-battery-costs-and-options-explained/

That's about the price of a brand new car (e.g., 2024 Nissan Versa: $16,390 MSRP).

reply

Don't you think they are still working on updating all this tech? I read about new ideas all the time.

Comparing to the original old electric vehicles is very silly. Things have changed a great amount since then.
Now we can go over 20 mph too. :)

reply

"Don't you think they are still working on updating all this tech?"

Of course they are, and you still won't see an EV battery pack that can be fully recharged in a minute or two in your lifetime, nor will you see one that doesn't cost many thousands of dollars to replace, nor will you see one that can be repaired by a mechanic or anyone else short of the factory that manufactured it in the first place (and they would have to almost completely remanufacture it to "repair" it).

"Comparing to the original old electric vehicles is very silly."

You don't know what you're talking about. You said...

"Well duh, it's a new technology."

... and not only were you wrong, but you were drastically, outrageously wrong. Pointing out the thing which proves you wrong isn't "silly," obviously. On the other hand, your laughably wrong assertion that it's a new technology (complete with the word "duh," no less) was beyond silly.

"Things have changed a great amount since then."

How is that possible if it's a "new technology" as you claimed? Of course, it isn't a new technology, it's a very old technology, and electric motors have changed very little since then. They are very simple devices.

Again, battery technology is what's lacking with regard to EVs; none of the other technology is lacking, so it's irrelevant here. Batteries have been around since 1800 (or for a couple thousand years if you count the "Baghdad Battery"), and if they are still lacking after two and a quarter centuries, what makes you think they are going to have a big breakthrough in anyone's lifetime?

"Now we can go over 20 mph too. :)"

What of it? The battery and electric motor technology from circa 1900 wasn't the limiting factor with regard to top speed. It's always been easy to get high RPM, power, and torque from electric motors, because they are such a simple design compared to ICEs. You essentially just have a shaft that's being rotated by an electrical field, rather than a shaft that has connecting rods and pistons attached to it which are being propelled by a timed series of explosions. You could put electric motors and batteries made using circa 1900 technology into a modern car chassis and it could be made to go as fast as a typical modern EV. You wouldn't have much range though because lead-acid batteries (which are still used today in ICE vehicles to, e.g., power the small electric motor that starts the engine) don't have as much energy density as modern lithium-ion batteries.

reply

Everything improves

reply

"Everything improves"

First, that's demonstrably false, and second, even if it were true, you didn't give a time frame for when the improvement will happen nor any details of what the improvement will consist of, which makes your assertion useless.

In any case, since you didn't address, let alone refute, anything I said, your tacit concession is noted.

reply

I haven't heard any whining. It probably depends on your social status.

reply

It's a tracked news feed thing. I keep up on tech so it drops articles to me about ev. Mostly the negative. Yet, they are all over the roads today.
Also, old family constantly brings it up as media told them to fret over it. :)

reply

Truth be told from what I have heard about them, they aren't good for long distance travel cause in a lot of places in my home country of the U.S don't have electric charging stations. Also Lithium which their batteries rely on is not good for the environment and not only that but it mainly comes from China who we aren't on good terms with. It could be gotten from Australia but it would involve kicking native people off their land to get it. Thirdly we aren't there technology wise to have electric semi trucks so there's that too.

reply

This is what I am talking about: everything you've HEARD.

I see from 1 to 20 electric cars on the streets right now, every time I go anywhere.

Is like what we are HEARING and what we are seeing are two different things. It's different for a bunch of folks in real world.
Of course, they don't go as far a gas right now, and you plan recharges over lunch or dinner... not much different than planning gas stops. Just more limited. Two peeps I know traveled across America in electric without issue

I'm wondering why we keep HEARING this constant preaching against it?
Give it time. It will improve, like solar panels, tvs, current cars, computers, phones, medicine etcetcetc

I'm not an ev shill.... I just bought two new ice cars in the last 4 years

reply

I took one longish road trip in my Tesla S LR. Charging on the road doesn't take any longer than gas fueling as long as you're not the type of driver who straps a soda bottle to his leg or wears a diaper. If you're doing a cannon ball run, pick a gas car..

My wife have always stopped every 2-3 hours on road trips for coffee, a meal, or to walk the dog or just stretch our backs. In the 20 minutes we stop, we can add another 2 plus hours of drive time.

If you drive 250 miles a day, an EV isn't a great choice. Since most people drive less than 50 a day, range anxiety is the province of those who never owned one. If you tow a big heavy trailer, an EV is not a good choice. If you can't charge at home, and EV is not a good choice.

I love my Tesla, but I hate the idea of mandates forcing them onto the general population - let the market decide.

reply

There are many reasons people hate EVs - the only one I agree with are the mandates many states (don't know about world wide) that are trying to force ICE cars off the road. If EVs are so great, you won't have to force them on anyone. Being a conservative, I hate when the gov mandates most things. Let the market decide.

The other hot button issue is the politics of "green". You just can't get a straight answer from either side. The oil side makes it sound like every EV is sold on the grave of a child, and the EV side makes it sound like ICE cars are rendering the planet inhabitable. What is the answer? Somewhere in between I guess.

From the actual car ownership of an EV, it depends on your situation. If you live in an apartment or some other place where charging means taking your car to a public charger and sitting there 15-30 minutes or more, then it's a big inconvenience to own one. How are the feds going to address this? Are they going to mandate that all apartment building owners make chargers available for most or all tenants like they do heat, AC, electricity, and water? Imagine the cost.

I've owned a Tesla S for 4 years, and the car is an absolute joy to own and drive. I have a charger in my garage and one outside in my driveway but would not own the car if I couldn't charge it at home. It's quiet, rides better than my old BMW 5, it's a lot faster than the Bimmer, and it doesn't need any kind of attention. I don't miss having to bring my car to a public place to fuel it, or crawling underneath to do oil changes or transmission services, and at 120K miles, it's still on the original brakes which are still in good shape. The first set of tires lasted 26K miles, the second set double that because I don't mash it at every light like I used to.

I love the one pedal driving but HATE the infotainment system - I would pay more for a mechanical control package. Using a menu to change the cabin temp on the fly? Dumb.

reply

quite OBVIOUSLY, big oil propaganda....


Let’s be honest, it’s just this. Electric cars have the potential to take down a multibillion dollar business, and they aren’t going to go down without a fight. Fully electric cars are not new technology, they figured it out almost 50 years ago

I don’t think any of the environmental stuff that people argue over actually matters. When the prices come down enough to off set the gas cost, people will go electric, and never worry about buying gas again.

reply

Do you really believe electricity will really be cheaper than gas?

reply


Gas can be volatile depending on world political crises or even weather events.

Electricity *should* be cheaper than it is now, but one of the problems is that electricity is based much on the oil or coal industry anyway. It's unfortunate the nuclear energy was pretty much legislated away. It's hard to get a straight (non political) answer as to whether the cost of building and maintaining wind or solar and the eventual EOL replacement makes it worth the cost, but I know several people with solar panels who net zero at about the 8 year mark after installation, and assuming the solar arrays are good for 15 years, they should be cheaper than utility provided juice.

But while gas prices may go up, a home installed array will be known fixed cost.

reply

Recent headline:

New 621-mile range EV battery charges in six minutes and works in any weather.

My ice car is good for about 350 miles

reply

This is the Phoenix cell battery announced in June 2023 from a startup. We hear these stories a lot. It sounds awesome, but has not been implemented or mass produced as of yet. Toyota has promised something similar which is far more believable. Would be really cool if these come out and have been consumer tested or placed in a vehicle to see the results. Not sure what price tag they would pull.

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chinese-startup-new-ev-battery-any-weather

I'm not sure why you are not being transparent.

reply

Nobody likes an overpriced vehicle that weighs twice as much as a regular car, that explodes when immersed in water too long, and craps out after a hundred miles, being forced on them. And they're not saving the planet at all. Someone still has to burn fuel at a power plant to get that electricity.

California has been a monument to stupidity because they've been shutting down a lot of the traditional nuclear and gas power plants all up and down the state, thinking that they can survive on windmills, sunlight, and buying electricity from places like Nevada and Arizona. Big surprise when the already strained electric grid craps out in the summertime from people trying to run their AC's in the extreme heat, and the magical fairy dust alternate energy sources can't meet the power demands. Do you really think it's smart to then have the majority of people in a state like that own vehicles that will then start to tax an already strained, dying electric grid?

I've been hearing a lot of other horror stories about EV's too. For example, the batteries don't last for very long, and some even leak toxic chemicals onto people's lawns or driveways if the outer case breaks. Some parking garages have actually had to force people with EV's not to park on higher levels because the weight of such cars are taxing the concrete supports. There's also been talk of people getting hit by EV's because they can't hear them when crossing the street (though I think that one is BS, because I've been near EV's and you can hear the distinct hum when close to them).

And for the record, gas-powered vehicles built after 2015 actually have gotten better because they now have better filters on the engines, so they don't pollute as much as the older cars.

reply

yes, you have been hearing a lot of horror stories, that is the point of my whole post. everyone is HEARING this and that.
everyone is FORWARDING these stories - true or not - obviously some of them are true... but no one is talking about the ICE cars that blow up etc, or the amount of money and eco damage gas cars do on a daily basis.

its all about run down the new game in town.

there's close to 1.5 BILLION vehicles romaing the earth, most of them spewing out pollution. that's a lot if you think about it.

The funny thing is, people actually believe the gov is going to FORCE/MANDATE people to go electric... but that is not going to happen if it doesn't actually work out. It's got to work better and get cheaper, or all that FORCING is not going to work at all - therefore, will not happen, if it can't.
"Here all people, buy an $80,000 car...." is what the mass media noise polution is pushing, but that isn't going to happen as the cars ARE too expensive right now. Heck, normal average cars are around 40k right now, should we be complaining about that?? I think so.

Tons of peeps already drive EV, they are all over the streets not blowing up left and right. per some posting in this thread that own them, they work out just fine, just a little different.

reply

You must live in CA or some big city somewhere, because EV's aren't as prevalent in a lot of other states. 8 out of 10 people in CA still drive gas-powered vehicles, regardless of how much hot air the state govt. likes to blow in the news.

Also, the only people who can afford them are upper-middle-class and the rich. Try selling such an overpriced maguffin like that to a cash-strapped person working two jobs and see how far you get in convincing them that EV's aren't the ponzie scheme everyone knows they are.

I'm still not hearing your defense for California's bad energy policies. You got an explanation for how that's gonna work with EV's?

reply

I'm actually in the middle third of USA, and not in a BIG city, just ok sized. I don't know anything about Cali, and think they are kind of crazy...

THAT SAID... I visited once and and came to understand why they pushed the "NO TOP OFF GAS FILLING" policy at gas pumps. All those tiny drops of spills helping to add up to terrible smog/polution with so many people in the area, etc, I guess people had to be forced to do better at that. People are selfish and don't self manage well.
But I have no knowledge of energy policies in CA

And I agree these cars are for the rich right now, so I don't get why the rest even care.... like FERARRIs was my example.

reply

I never whined about anything that can be bought or sold.

reply