MovieChat Forums > Lana Wachowski Discussion > Who writes the fucking descriptions?

Who writes the fucking descriptions?


Reading this description it say growing up with his sister Lily... He didn't grow up with a sister named Lily. He grew up with a brother named Andy. Andy changed his name long after they both grew up so how the fuck does one grow up with sister that didn't exist.

reply

Easy. Stay the course. Follow the plan. Mental illness is heroic.

reply

Enabling someone that is delusional isn't helping anyone. That's the nuttiness of these liberal loons that think because someone says they are woman then bingo, they were always a woman... I suppose if this idiot had claimed they were an eagle that the liberal loons would toss them from a building.

reply

As long as they don’t do something Hitlarian and declare all lives matter.

reply

If you go on their wikipedia page or if you were to seek out an actual comprehensive biographical profile then you would undoubtedly find that they discuss the fact that they TRANSITIONED into being sisters and that, yes, in fact, they both were born male

This is a fucking IMDb bio, I hardly think they care about an in-depth description when all that really matters for IMDb is describing their film careers. They don't bother going into the fact that they were both, at one point, brothers because it would be unnecessary and they are a mainstream website that has no motive to court controversy

This should be common sense, christ. You people love to say how liberals whine about everything as you literally whine about fucking everything

reply

Anyone using wikipedia for a source of reliable info has some serious problems. Even the guy that created wikipedia has written it off as junk.

reply

Do you have education in psychology, physiology, psychiatry, endocrinology, or even medicine?

Have you researched transgenderism at all? Outside of a google search that is and had that study peer reviewed?

If not, what makes you an expert on the subject and what the proper treatment is? Where is your backed up research that
1. it is a delusion
2. acceptance isn't the treatment

Also, this isn't a political issue so stop making it one.

reply

No one needs a degree to know when someone is delusional. When a man thinks he is a woman he is just delusional as when a man thinks he is parrot. If you are too stupid to understand than then you should probably make sure there are no sharp objects nearby.

reply

Again, even if it is a delusion, what is your expertise to be able to know what the best treatment would be?

reply

You don't have to know how to treat someone with a delusion to know that pretending the delusion is real is not going to help the person only enable their delusion.

reply

ACTUALLY...YES YOU DO.

reply

Ummm what? So you know how to treat delusions? What is your expertise on that?

reply

You don't treat delusional people you lock-em up. Do you think you can treat a rabid dog?

reply

"You don't treat delusional people you lock-em up."

Uhhh, what???

So you admit that you know nothing about modern psychiatry or psychology

Because that is not how modern psychiatrists treat delusional mental states. We don't have lunatic asylums anymore. Hospitalization is one step of the process, but it isn't always necessary and most people undergoing delusions are not automatically hospitalized

I know that you understand this and you're just being dense on purpose because you just want to get the hate out and put it down somewhere. But understand that everything you are saying is objectively wrong

reply

Just because a bunch of liberal cunts managed to get asylums closed doesn't mean it was the right thing to do. If someone is disconnected from reality lock them up because who the fuck knows what they are going go to... and that's the kind gentil thing to do because the best option is to put a bullet in their skull like you would a rabid dog.

reply

Why do you feel the need to make every thing political? You must be a really miserable person. Maybe you need to be locked up.

reply

You see politics in everything don't you? What fucking loser. Newsflash, liberal isn't a political party you can find dumb liberal cunts in both parties.

reply

You are the one making everything political.

You are really a miserable human being and you have my pity.

reply

[deleted]

of the closet?
how brave

reply

Yeah. Not a comparison that makes any sense.

You know what else used to get people locked up in asylums? Masturbation, epilepsy, and let's not even get into being a woman, because many reasons could get you locked up. So yeah, isn't a good thing that we've made progress and advancements in the field of mental health?

reply

If you look at the percent of the population with a mental illiness it is higher now than it ever has been... so clearly the current limp wristed attempt to treat it hasn't worked with a shit.

reply

And asylums worked so well. Yeah, that's delusional.

reply

If the crazy fucks are locked up and can't bother normal people then yes, they worked fucking great.

reply

Sure the population with a mental illness is bigger then ever. How do you think the left wins elections without any reasonable plan?

reply

Before Wokies corrupted psychiatry, the DSM called it Gender Identity Disorder.

reply

Okay, like I asked Thomas, how would you treat it? Perhaps you feel like you know more? I'm sure you would take treatment from some random person on the internet for any other illness like cancer.

So what if gender dysphoria is a mental illness? If acceptance is a treatment, why are you so afraid to just mind your own business and not care? Just treating them with kindness is too difficult?

reply

Okay, like I asked Thomas, how would you treat it?

Gender dysphoria is a brain hardwired condition. There's no known treatment as of today. And even if there was, "treating" it would modify the identity of that person, so the person that was would not be anymore. Some people would choose to follow it and some people wouldn't. Whatever the case, as of today, the best path for that person is to live as a person of the opposite gender. Suffering for the sake of suffering is non-sense.

That said, two notes:

1. That doesn't mean that the person actually has the opposite gender. It just means he feels that way and (probably) he'll be happier living under that role.

2. Gender Dysphoria is extremely rare, about 1 in 10,000. High occurrence in modern western countries is mostly due to the attached religious holy considerations in woke creed. That's to be expected. If the dominant creed saw cripples as holy, you'd suddenly see people with canes everywhere.

reply

1. Gender is a social construct. It is not the same as biological sex.

2. What is woke creed? Less than 1% of the population identify as trans. What does that have to do with random people on the internet knowing more than doctors and experts in the field and telling others how to treat people?

reply

I can translate because I am semi-fluent in alt-right gibberish: he is saying that because the woke left deifies transgenderism, that more people are coming out as transgender even though they are not genuinely suffering from the condition known as Gender Dysphoria

Presumably out of a desire to be exalted by their peers, sort of like how certain right-wingers go out of their way to say bigoted things so that they can be exalted by their peers

reply

While I appreciate the translation, I think it's ridiculous to assign a political leaning to something that affects people all over the world and throughout history to some sort of American right and left squabble.

reply

Oh, I agree. But that's how Americans are about their politics. They feel entitled to give strong opinions on anything and everything. And people's experiences are treated as mere bullet-points on a political portfolio or as pawns in a political chess match

It's very gross, but that's just the way it is. And I'm not under the illusion that America is alone in this. Most of the world is not particularly tolerant of trans people, just like they weren't (and some parts still aren't) tolerant of homosexuals. The conversation just happens to play out in a very loud, abrasive way here because that is the nature of Americans

reply

at least you're not disagreeing with him

reply

I disagree with him

reply

Gender is a social construct. It is not the same as biological sex.

Gender is a social construct based and built on top of biological sex.

What is woke creed?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creed
Creed: a brief authoritative formula of religious belief
example: the Nicene Creed


Less than 1% of the population identify as trans.

Which is about 100 times the natural occurrence.

What does that have to do with random people on the internet knowing more than doctors and experts in the field and telling others how to treat people?

So we should listen to them? As you wish. The main association of psychiatrists and experts in the biggest country in the world (China) says that transgenderism is a mental illness. Which means we should accept that, isn't it?

reply

I'm really not understanding your point.

Just because gender is based on biological sex, it doesn't mean it's the same thing.

I know the definition of creed, thank you. But what is "the woke creed"? You are always complaining about it. What does it entail?

I have never said that I know what transgenderism is. I don't know if it's a mental illness or a physiological one. My point is that on this page and Elliot Page's page there are so many "keyboard experts" who know exactly what it is and how these people should be treated. Usually it is not with kindness. All I am asking is here is what is thomas998's expertise in this area that they are so convinced that these people need to be locked away in a mental asylum?

Why is it so difficult to have empathy and just to be kind? If that is part of the so called woke creed, then sign me up.

reply

Just because gender is based on biological sex, it doesn't mean it's the same thing.

Gender is a social construct based in a real world physical element, which is sexual dimorphism in humans. Of course, you can unlink it from the real world. The problem is that if when it becomes something you can freely choose, the concept itself becomes pointless.

Weight category in boxing is a social construct too, an artificial category based in a real world element: the weight of the boxer. Of course, you can unlink it from the real world element. You're a heavy weight and you have no luck? Then identify yourself as a lightweight, sure you're gonna do much better in that category!

Social constructs are there because of reasons. Being an artificial social construct doesn't mean it's random.

I know the definition of creed, thank you. But what is "the woke creed"

By "woke" I mean the mainstream trend in modern left. It has been called "SJW" or "cultural Marxism" too. It's basically a blend of white-guilt, the so-called "diversity" (only in white countries, of course) and 4th wave feminism.

All I am asking is here is what is thomas998's expertise in this area that they are so convinced that these people need to be locked away in a mental asylum?

I said before that in my opinion, the best option for a person who (really) has gender dysphoria is probably to live under the role of the opposite sex. That doesn't mean it's not a mental disorder. It's a mental disorder, but you can have a mental disorder and live a happy and productive life.

CONT →

reply

→ CONT

Why is it so difficult to have empathy and just to be kind?

Kindness has been abused to push a toxic religious/political agenda (wokeness). When you abuse kindness to push an agenda, the logical consequence is that people eventually stop being kind. Kindness is a social capital, and it's not unlimited.

Males are prone to be kind and supportive when a female says she was abused or raped. But that kindness has been abused to the point of transforming these accusations into ready-to-use weapons against males, destroying the presumption of innocence. So, why people are stopping being kind? Well, guess why.

reply

When it comes to trans individuals I think you and I are on the same page for the most part. When it comes to your reasons as for why people can't be kind I object. I'm not saying that you are wrong on all counts. Society likes to swing from one extreme to another. Right now I will agree that some parts of political correctness are really out there. I know that the pendulum will swing back, but hopefully not as far the other way. I truly believe that most people on this planet fit somewhere in the middle. Right now the fringe voices on both sides are really loud, but I do not feel that they are the majority of any side.

That being said, when you talk about males being supportive until they are accused, I have to ask you if you have been falsely accused? I think that the media has misrepresented the #metoo movement, but I do think that most women and a fair amount of men have experienced sexual harassment. Not all of that are illegal acts and sometimes we just want to say it's not cool when that happens. The reactions to some of these accusations may not fit the crime. I do want to know where all these false claims are? I'm not denying that it has happened, not at all, but I'm not sure it's anywhere near the amount that you seem to suggest. As a woman and a survivor of both childhood and adulthood sexual abuse, I feel that false accusations are just as bad as an actual assault. I feel that they should be punished harshly. They really harm those of us who have been abused. But....don't equate lack of evidence as freedom from guilt from the crime. Look at the reactions to any accusation now. Especially on here. It's disgusting and just further proof why victims don't come forward right away.

That is also not a justifiable reason to stop being kind, especially towards a group of people who have hate coming at them in all directions. It's really easy to give into hate, but that hate will destroy you as much as the group of people you are aiming it at.

reply

"Kindness is a social capital, and it's not unlimited."

Coward's answer.

reply

It's actually pretty brave. When the concept of "kindness" is constantly leveraged against you, compelling you to give one inch, after another inch, after another inch, after another inch, to the point where you are being compelled to say things that you don't believe at all, and that are the antithesis of physical, biological, scientific reality, then pushing back against "kindness" becomes pretty fucking brave.

reply

But, more importantly, are their films any good?

reply

The matrix was good in my opinion. Not a fan of their other work. V for vendetta seems to resonate with a big audience.

reply

HE GREW UP WITH HIS SIBLING WHO IS HIS SISTER LILY....PRETTY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND...WHY DO YOU DICKLESS CLOSET MONSTERS GET SO HUNG UP ON OTHER PEOPLE'S SHIT?

reply

HE GREW UP WITH HIS SIBLING WHO IS HIS SISTER LILY....PRETTY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND...WHY DO YOU DICKLESS CLOSET MONSTERS GET SO HUNG UP ON OTHER PEOPLE'S SHIT?

HE???? You just called him He, and said HIS sibling. Could it be that your innate sense of Earthly, scientific reality is interfering with your new, 22 month old code of wokeness, and all the compelled speech that comes along with it?

reply

I'M NOT WOKE...I ALSO DON'T CARE IF I SCREW UP SOME WORDS...MY INTENTION IS HONEST AND FAIR...THOSE GUYS ARE CHICKS NOW...I,LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AM ADAPTING TO THINGS THAT ARE NEW TO ME.

reply

MY INTENTION IS HONEST AND FAIR.

I know. I don't question that.
THOSE GUYS ARE CHICKS NOW

No. Literally nothing fundamental about them as human beings has changed, other than superficial cosmetics. If they were guys, as you again just said they were, then you obviously recognize on some level that that's what they are.
I,LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AM ADAPTING TO THINGS THAT ARE NEW TO ME.

I think that you're trying really hard to get used to saying things that you don't actually believe at all, on a deep-down, honest gut-level. That's why you keep "misgendering" them.

reply

DO I BELIEVE THEY ARE WOMEN NOW?...BIG QUESTION...THE ANSWER YES AND NO...WE ALL KNOW WHAT THEY HAD TO UNDERGO TO BECOME WOMEN...SO NO THEY AREN'T "NATURAL BORN WOMEN"...BUT THEY DID GO THROUGH A LOT TO BECOME WOMEN AND THEY ARE NO LONGER MEN...SO YES,THEY ARE WOMEN...AS FAR AS THIS ISSUE AND ME IS CONCERNED...I AM HIGH AS FUCK...I TYPE RAMPANT RIDICULOUSNESS...WE SHOULD ALL BE THANKFUL I MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL.

reply

inserts member into Kowalski's mouth See? You just need to adapt to things new to you. ;)

reply

THAT WOULDN'T BE NEW TO ME.😉

reply

I agree with this. They are completely blurring the lines and the facts. Trying to make it more acceptable.

reply

Clearly, you don't understand the holy miracle of gender identity proclamation. It cleans one retroactively from the original sin of being born a penis-carrier.

Praise be!

reply