MovieChat Forums > Executive Decision (1996) Discussion > The worst movie title ever?

The worst movie title ever?


It has to be up there.

reply

I have not seen this but I can think of worse. How about the Gingerdead Man?

reply

That’s a good title because it’s so dumb and amusing.

‘Executive Decision’ sounds bland as all hell, and conjures images of white collar bureaucrats armed with pens and whiteboards.

I’m almost certain its title is responsible for the mediocre box office.

Something like ‘Fire Flight’ or ‘Hijack’ would have brought more people in. Hell even ‘Sky Hard’ would have at least been amusing.

reply

It made $122 million on a $55 million budget in a time when 2x production budget was considered the standard for whether or not a film was profitable. So the box office wasn't bad.

I'm sure that, especially once you factor in home video rentals and sales, the studio was pleased.

Executive Decision does sound bland, undoubtedly, but I don't think the title had much to do with its financial performance. It was a cool-looking action movie with Kurt Russell and a then-hot Steven Seagal. I went to see it.

reply

Totally agree!

It did well but it would have done better with a less bland title.

However I think the award for the coolest movie with the worst title has to go to "Sexy Beast. (2000)"

reply

Collateral Beauty

reply

Darkman III: Die Darkman Die is hands down the worst movie title I have ever heard of. Granted it was a direct-to-video sequel to a direct-to-video sequel of a early movie from Sam Raimi, but still.

reply

Flight Risk would have been better.

reply

I don’t know, I think it has a certain “straight to video” ring to it.

reply

"From the guys who gave you Scorcher and then brought you Scorcher II, and the gave you Scorcher III the new batch now brings you a new type of movie... Executive Decision...get ready to rumble."

reply

Well in the movie's defense, it was an Executive Decision from the Pentagon to order the fighter jets to blow the jetliner out of the sky because of the nerve gas on board. But, being that the crew aboard was able to signal morse code to the fighter pilots via the nav lights, that didn't have to happen.

reply

Well in the movie's defense, it was an Executive Decision from the Pentagon to order the fighter jets to blow the jetliner out of the sky because of the nerve gas on board. But, being that the crew aboard was able to signal morse code to the fighter pilots via the nav lights, that didn't have to happen.


That was my first thought too upon seeing this thread, but upon reflection, I note that it's a single plot point mentioned in passing, not even a crucial plot point at that. What else were they going to do, once they suspected the nerve gas might be aboard?

I don't mind the title, actually, but this thread's got me thinking something with "Air" or "Sky" in the title might've worked better.

reply

The movie plot is to defy the executive decision.

reply

The Last Jedi. Bc it f**ks up using 'Jedi' to mean Return of the Jedi

reply