White people in the 80's

What previous reasoning? That I said he said it for not genuine reasons? Yeah nope my point on that is still consistent.

The point doesn't bother me, the reason he is posting about it bothers me. He is doing it with ulterior motives. You know it and I know it.

Nope bullshit. I don't support don't policy which is harmful to anyone. That's rich coming from a guy who supports the drug war. Comical irony alert!

You won't answer my question but want yours answered. What's his solution to making whites happy? Be honest now. See you are afraid to be honest about what his solution would be. That's because you know deep down it's a racist one.

"What is the problem that made white people unhappy?"
Are you getting him to confirm what you know
or actually asking?
are white people unhappy?
I for one dont really know wht the OP is talking about , becasuse as was pointed oput to me the race relations of Black and white is pretty much the same then and now .


but look at this little exchange from earlier , what does thta tell us?

Yatzo: Go to the beach

[–] curiousMInd101 (1015) 4 days ago
Which beach?

[–] Yatzo (1522) 4 days ago
The one where you get a tan

[–] curiousMInd101 (1015) 4 days ago
No I mean where is the beech for White people only?


i think basically the new troll in town threw some outrageous race baiting up , and you two are arguing about its validity

i mean look at the post below :
"It has ruined the fun. With no lynchings, what are me an the boys supposed to do on the weekends?"

Well you glamorize the 80's so much I figured he was relevant. I love how I proved that Aliens was woke and you couldn't refute it. That was hilarious. Either way I love seeing you exposed whether it's by me or anyone else with half a brain on these boards.

Nope bullshit. Notice how you bypassed you getting proven wrong. I proved he was a racist, I proved he doesn't want a reasonable debate. His responses proved that. He only wants his points spit back at him. He isn't open to debating otherwise his responses wouldn't be things like saying whites are superior and are made to feel guilt about it. My whole point about him was he brought up white guilt as an antagonistic tactic to race bait. You know this deep down and are afraid to admit it.

I wasn't the only one to point this out. You just don't take issue with his bigotry or racism because it favors whites. If this was the other way you would sing a different tune. Stop lying and be honest for once.

I can eat you alive in debating. You are too chicken shit to man up and do it.

When I provided the proof and you ignored it? No I'm not giving you crap about not remembering, you ignored my claim even though I proved it. It shows you refused to look at proof I provided. It has nothing to do with your memory. You have the link right there. Refute it or concede. You know you can't and therefore make up stuff I am not saying because you know I won.

Nope your point got eliminated. So I will copy and paste just like you did.

You don't have to be tentatively willing to accept my claim. There is proof of him saying that exact quote. I made it easy for you by providing the proof. That isn't shooting the messenger. It is me calling out antagonistic behavior. His reasons by that reply prove he is only trying to stir the pot and race bait as I originally said.

So now with me proving he said that you going to drop your shit about him not being antagonistic and wanting a genuine debate? Or you going to keep being an apologist for this guy? You lost this debate and badly.

I proved he didn't want a genuine debate and was antagonistic. You claimed he wasn't antagonistic. Address him bring antagonistic with that reply or concede.

Nope otherwise you would not have used the word tentative. Which by definition means not certain or fixed. I know you thought I missed you saying that l. I'm rather thorough in what I read. So nope fail from you. Next time try it on someone who doesn't comprehend what they read. That's not going to pass by me.

Nope I don't support any policy which hinders a race. I just don't agree with you about what hinders white people. The end. Noting more.

Oh and me a simp? I'm not the one who willingly gives money to ideologies I hate. That's you.

Yeah you don't like that I hold you accountable for your own words.

I didn't say Jim Crowe was. I said whites did in fact have an advantage and had it better in the 50s. Ok so you agree the economy was better in both decades. Now doesn't a groups happiness rely pretty heavily on whether the economy is good or not?